Literature DB >> 23543279

Modelling clavicular and scapular kinematics: from measurement to simulation.

Bart Bolsterlee1, H E J Veeger, F C T van der Helm.   

Abstract

Musculoskeletal models are intended to be used to assist in prevention and treatments of musculoskeletal disorders. To capture important aspects of shoulder dysfunction, realistic simulation of clavicular and scapular movements is crucial. The range of motion of these bones is dependent on thoracic, clavicular and scapular anatomy and therefore different for each individual. Typically, patient or subject measurements will therefore not fit on a model that uses a cadaveric morphology. Up till now, this problem was solved by adjusting measured bone rotations such that they fit on the model, but this leads to adjustments of on average 3.98° and, in some cases, even more than 8°. Two novel methods are presented that decrease this discrepancy between experimental data and simulations. For one method, the model is scaled to fit the subject, leading to a 34 % better fit compared to the existing method. In the other method, the set of possible joint rotations is increased by allowing some variation on motion constraints, resulting in a 42 % better fit. This change in kinematics also affected the kinetics: muscle forces of some important scapular stabilizing muscles, as predicted by the Delft Shoulder and Elbow Model, were altered by maximally 17 %. The effect on the glenohumeral joint contact force was however marginal (1.3 %). The methods presented in this paper might lead to more realistic shoulder simulations and can therefore be considered a step towards (clinical) application, especially for applications that involve scapular imbalance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23543279     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-013-1065-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  30 in total

1.  Measuring muscle and joint geometry parameters of a shoulder for modeling purposes.

Authors:  M D Klein Breteler; C W Spoor; F C Van der Helm
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A three-dimensional regression model of the shoulder rhythm.

Authors:  J H de Groot; R Brand
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Anatomic variance of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Authors:  R I Harris; D H Vu; D H Sonnabend; J A Goldberg; W R Walsh
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control.

Authors:  Katherine R S Holzbaur; Wendy M Murray; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  A mathematical musculoskeletal shoulder model for proactive ergonomic analysis.

Authors:  Clark R Dickerson; Don B Chaffin; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Towards a model for force predictions in the human shoulder.

Authors:  D Karlsson; B Peterson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Variability of femoral muscle attachments.

Authors:  G N Duda; D Brand; S Freitag; W Lierse; E Schneider
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Three-dimensional recording and description of motions of the shoulder mechanism.

Authors:  F C van der Helm; G M Pronk
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Musculoskeletal model of the upper limb based on the visible human male dataset.

Authors:  B A Garner; M G Pandy
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.763

10.  Evaluation of different analytical methods for subject-specific scaling of musculotendon parameters.

Authors:  C R Winby; D G Lloyd; T B Kirk
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of musculoskeletal modelling for the shoulder and upper limb.

Authors:  Bart Bolsterlee; Dirkjan H E J Veeger; Edward K Chadwick
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Real-time simulation of three-dimensional shoulder girdle and arm dynamics.

Authors:  Edward K Chadwick; Dimitra Blana; Robert F Kirsch; Antonie J van den Bogert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Shoulder biomechanics and the success of translational research.

Authors:  Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Edward K Chadwick
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Defining the shape of the scapulothoracic gliding surface.

Authors:  Tomas Paquet; Robin Van Den Broecke; Stijn Casier; Jan Van Houcke; Lieven De Wilde; Alexander Van Tongel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Uncertainty analysis and sensitivity of scapulothoracic joint angles to kinematic model parameters.

Authors:  Y Blache; I Rogowski; M Degot; R Trama; R Dumas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  A Patient-Specific Foot Model for the Estimate of Ankle Joint Forces in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Authors:  Joe A I Prinold; Claudia Mazzà; Roberto Di Marco; Iain Hannah; Clara Malattia; Silvia Magni-Manzoni; Maurizio Petrarca; Anna B Ronchetti; Laura Tanturri de Horatio; E H Pieter van Dijkhuizen; Stefan Wesarg; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Cervical Spine Injuries: A Whole-Body Musculoskeletal Model for the Analysis of Spinal Loading.

Authors:  Dario Cazzola; Timothy P Holsgrove; Ezio Preatoni; Harinderjit S Gill; Grant Trewartha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Scaling and kinematics optimisation of the scapula and thorax in upper limb musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  Joe A I Prinold; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Knee Kinematics Estimation Using Multi-Body Optimisation Embedding a Knee Joint Stiffness Matrix: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Vincent Richard; Giuliano Lamberto; Tung-Wu Lu; Aurelio Cappozzo; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A New Skeleton Model and the Motion Rhythm Analysis for Human Shoulder Complex Oriented to Rehabilitation Robotics.

Authors:  Song Zhibin; Ma Tianyu; Nie Chao; Niu Yijun
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 1.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.