Literature DB >> 20649219

On chirp stimuli and neural synchrony in the suprathreshold auditory brainstem response.

Matthew A Petoe1, Andrew P Bradley, Wayne J Wilson.   

Abstract

The chirp-evoked ABR has been regarded as a more synchronous response than the click-evoked ABR, referring to the belief that the chirp stimulates lower-, mid-, and higher-frequency regions of the cochlea simultaneously. In this study a variety of tools were used to analyze the synchronicity of ABRs evoked by chirp- and click-stimuli at 40 dB HL in 32 normal hearing subjects aged 18 to 55 years (mean=24.8 years, SD=7.1 years). Compared to the click-evoked ABRs, the chirp-evoked ABRs showed larger wave V amplitudes, but an absence of earlier waves in the grand averages, larger wave V latency variance, smaller FFT magnitudes at the higher component frequencies, and larger phase variance at the higher component frequencies. These results strongly suggest that the chirp-evoked ABRs exhibited less synchrony than the click-evoked ABRs in this study. It is proposed that the temporal compensation offered by chirp stimuli is sufficient to increase neural recruitment (as measured by wave V amplitude), but that destructive phase interactions still exist along the cochlea partition, particularly in the low frequency portions of the cochlea where more latency jitter is expected. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649219     DOI: 10.1121/1.3436527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Sinnet G B Kristensen; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  [Objective frequency-specific measurement of hearing threshold using narrow-band chirp stimuli with level-adaptive simultaneous masking].

Authors:  I Baljić; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Effects of temporal stimulus properties on the perception of across-frequency asynchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; Alexander Hardy; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-19

6.  Evaluation of Speed and Accuracy of Next-Generation Auditory Steady State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Children With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yvonne S Sininger; Lisa L Hunter; Deborah Hayes; Patricia A Roush; Kristin M Uhler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Test-Retest Reliability of Level-Specific CE-Chirp Auditory Brainstem Response in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Fatin Nabilah Jamal; Ahmad Aidil Arafat Dzulkarnain; Fatin Amira Shahrudin; Muhammad Nasrullah Marzuki
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2020-06-25

8.  Hearing impairment in murine model of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Guang-Di Chen; Li Li; Andrew McCall; Dalian Ding; Zhuo Xing; Y Eugene Yu; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.772

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.