Literature DB >> 28511946

National Incidence of Patient Safety Indicators in the Total Hip Arthroplasty Population.

Joseph E Tanenbaum1, Derrick M Knapik2, Glenn D Wera3, Steven J Fitzgerald2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services use the incidence of patient safety indicators (PSIs) to determine health care value and hospital reimbursement. The national incidence of PSI has not been quantified in the total hip arthroplasty (THA) population, and it is unknown if patient insurance status is associated with PSI incidence after THA.
METHODS: All patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) who underwent THA in 2013 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The incidence of PSI was determined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis code algorithms published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The association of insurance status and the incidence of PSI during the inpatient episode was determined by comparing privately insured and Medicare patients with Medicaid/self-pay patients using a logistic regression model that controlled for patient demographics, patient comorbidities, and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS: In 2013, the NIS included 68,644 hospitalizations with primary THA performed during the inpatient episode. During this period, 429 surgically relevant PSI were recorded in the NIS. The estimated national incidence rate of PSI after primary THA was 0.63%. In our secondary analysis, the privately insured cohort had significantly lower odds of experiencing one or more PSIs relative to the Medicaid/self-pay cohort (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.76).
CONCLUSION: The national incidence of PSI among THA patients is relatively low. However, primary insurance status is associated with the incidence of one or more PSIs after THA. As value-based payment becomes more widely adopted in the United States, quality benchmarks and penalty thresholds need to account for these differences in risk-adjustment models to promote and maintain access to care in the underinsured population.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AHRQ; NIS; patient safety; total hip arthroplasty; value-based purchasing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28511946      PMCID: PMC5572751          DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  42 in total

1.  Atlantoaxial fusion: a biomechanical analysis of two C1-C2 fusion techniques.

Authors:  Roderick Claybrooks; Mark Kayanja; Ryan Milks; Edward Benzel
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Effect of post-discharge venous thromboembolism on hospital quality comparisons following hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin S Kester; Ryan P Merkow; Mila H Ju; Terrance D Peabody; David J Bentrem; Clifford Y Ko; Karl Y Bilimoria
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Association between insurance status and patient safety in the lumbar spine fusion population.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Vincent J Alentado; Jacob A Miller; Daniel Lubelski; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Medicaid payer status is associated with in-hospital morbidity and resource utilization following primary total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  James A Browne; Wendy M Novicoff; Michele R D'Apuzzo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Insurance status and reportable quality metrics in the cervical spine fusion population.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Jacob A Miller; Vincent J Alentado; Daniel Lubelski; Benjamin P Rosenbaum; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Medicaid status is associated with higher complication rates after spine surgery.

Authors:  Jacques Hacquebord; Amy M Cizik; Sree Harsha Malempati; Mark A Konodi; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens Chapman; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Primary payer status is significantly associated with postoperative mortality, morbidity, and hospital resource utilization in pediatric surgical patients within the United States.

Authors:  Matthew L Stone; Damien J LaPar; Daniel P Mulloy; Sara K Rasmussen; Bartholomew J Kane; Eugene D McGahren; Bradley M Rodgers
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Disparities in the outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery based on insurance status.

Authors:  Shivanand P Lad; Kevin T Huang; Jacob H Bagley; Matthew A Hazzard; Ranjith Babu; Timothy Ryan Owens; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Chirag G Patil; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Predictors of outcomes and hospital charges following atlantoaxial fusion.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Daniel Lubelski; Benjamin P Rosenbaum; Nicolas R Thompson; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Medicaid insurance as primary payer predicts increased mortality after total hip replacement in the state inpatient databases of California, Florida and New York.

Authors:  Hannah F Xu; Robert S White; Dahniel L Sastow; Michael H Andreae; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Zachary A Turnbull
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 9.452

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.