Literature DB >> 20643621

Modifiable factors that influence colon cancer lymph node sampling and examination.

Matias E Valsecchi1, John Leighton, William Tester.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in the United States. Its single most important prognostic factor is lymph node involvement. Multiple guidelines recommend sampling a minimum of 12 nodes, to ensure accurate staging and treatment. However, this standard of care is not always achieved. The objective of this study was to identify potential modifiable factors that may explain this inadequacy between the optimal approach and routine practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical charts of all patients treated for colorectal cancer stages I-III at the Albert Einstein Medical Center from 1999-2007 were reviewed. Associations between multiple surgical and pathologic variables and the presence of >or= 12 lymph nodes in the final pathology report were examined.
RESULTS: In total, 337 patients were included in this study. The mean number of nodes reported was 12.7 (standard deviation, +/- 7.6), and 173 patients (51%) had >or= 12 lymph nodes. Regarding patients' demographic characteristics, 78% were more than 60 years of age; 47.8% were male; and 27% were white, 67% were African American, and 6% were of other ethnic groups. Using a univariate analysis, several variables were statistically associated with the >/= 12 lymph nodes reported: colon length (Pearson r = 0.384; P < .001); thickness of the mesocolon (Pearson r = 0.294; P < .001); size of tumor (Pearson r = 0.154; P = .005); site of tumor (right vs. left, P < .001); type of surgery (right or subtotal colectomy vs. others, P < .001), experience of pathologist (P = .02); pathologist's assistant (P = .006); and experience of surgeon (P < .001). Using a multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, and race, colon length (P = .001), type of surgery (odds ratio [OR], 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-5.6; P < .001), surgeon's experience (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.4-3.9; P = .001), pathologist's experience (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2; P = .01), and role of the pathologist's assistant (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3; P = .001) remained as significant predictors.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that multiple factors influence the number of lymph nodes sampled. The roles of the surgeon, the pathologist, and especially the pathologist's assistant comprise significant variables that could be modified with appropriate education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643621     DOI: 10.3816/CCC.2010.n.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  12 in total

1.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable.

Authors:  Jamie Murphy; Tonia Young-Fadok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Factors affecting lymph node yield from patients undergoing colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Zubin M Bamboat; Danielle Deperalta; Abdulmetin Dursun; David L Berger; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in routine clinical practice: a population-based study.

Authors:  J C Del Paggio; S Nanji; X Wei; P H MacDonald; C M Booth
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Predictors of lymph node count in colorectal cancer resections: data from US nationwide prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Noriko Tanaka; Aya Kuchiba; Katsuhiko Nosho; Mai Yamauchi; Jason L Hornick; Richard S Swanson; Andrew T Chan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Curtis Huttenhower; Deborah Schrag; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08

5.  Ex Vivo Lymphadenectomy During Gastrectomy for Adenocarcinoma Optimizes Lymph Node Yield.

Authors:  Cheguevara Afaneh; Adam Levy; Luke Selby; Geoffrey Ku; Laura Tang; Sam S Yoon; Daniel Coit; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Isidoro Di Carlo; Roberto Scilletta; Beniamino Scilletta; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Non-surgical factors influencing lymph node yield in colon cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Wood; Colin Peirce; Jurgen Mulsow
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-05-15

8.  Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term outcomes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center.

Authors:  Carmelo Magistro; Stefano Di Lernia; Giovanni Ferrari; Antonio Zullino; Michele Mazzola; Paolo De Martini; Stefano De Carli; Antonello Forgione; Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio; Raffaele Pugliese
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Märkl
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Using low concentration sodium hypochlorite to improve colorectal surgical specimen lymph node harvest.

Authors:  Nanrong Yu; Haiying Liu; Jianchang Li; Shicai Chen
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.