Literature DB >> 32337032

Using low concentration sodium hypochlorite to improve colorectal surgical specimen lymph node harvest.

Nanrong Yu1, Haiying Liu1, Jianchang Li1, Shicai Chen1.   

Abstract

Lymph node (LN) retrieval is a critical procedure to determine the pathological stage and adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. The present study aimed to recommend a novel method by using sodium hypochlorite to improve colorectal surgical specimen LN harvest. Dissolving time of mesenteric LNs and fat tissue was firstly investigated in different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite. In the sodium hypochlorite group, 65 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery were included. After standard manual gross dissection, the mesenteric tissue was subsequently immersed in 1% sodium hypochlorite for ~30 min, and then manual dissection was again applied for additional LN harvest. In the manual method group, 68 patients with colorectal cancer were selected and only manual dissection method was applied for LN harvest. The number of LNs in both groups were recorded for each case. Sodium hypochlorite could dissolve fat tissue significantly faster than LNs and the low concentration sodium hypochlorite had the maximum dissolving time difference between fat tissue and LNs (P<0.001). After sodium hypochlorite treatment, more LNs were identified when compared with the manual dissection method (28.2±12.1 vs. 16.5±8.7; P=0.010), whereas the number of positive LNs had no significant statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.181). After sodium hypochlorite immersion, 818 additional LNs (12.5±4.8 per case) were identified and LNs ≤2 mm were 58.4% (478/818). Moreover, 16 additional metastatic LNs were found in 10 patients. A total of 7 of them were upstaged, including 2 initially N0 cases. Using sodium hypochlorite at low concentrations may be the most simple, rapid, cost-saving, nontoxic and effective technique to improve LN harvest in colorectal carcinoma specimens so far. This method should be used routinely regardless of whether the number of LNs is <12 or not.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; lymph nodes; sodium hypochlorite

Year:  2020        PMID: 32337032      PMCID: PMC7179393          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2020.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  31 in total

1.  Mechanised one-day fat clearance method to increase the lymph node yield in rectal cancer specimens.

Authors:  A G Prabhudesai; R Dalton; D Kumar; C J Finlayson
Journal:  Br J Biomed Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.829

2.  Colon Cancer, Version 1.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Al B Benson; Alan P Venook; Lynette Cederquist; Emily Chan; Yi-Jen Chen; Harry S Cooper; Dustin Deming; Paul F Engstrom; Peter C Enzinger; Alessandro Fichera; Jean L Grem; Axel Grothey; Howard S Hochster; Sarah Hoffe; Steven Hunt; Ahmed Kamel; Natalie Kirilcuk; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Wells A Messersmith; Mary F Mulcahy; James D Murphy; Steven Nurkin; Leonard Saltz; Sunil Sharma; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena M Stoffel; Eden Stotsky-Himelfarb; Christopher G Willett; Christina S Wu; Kristina M Gregory; Deborah Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  A modified GEWF solution is cost-saving and effective for lymph node retrieval in resected colorectal carcinoma specimens.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Ma; Ju-Xiang Ye; Jing Su; Fei-Fei Qi; Qing-Yang Meng; Xue-Ying Shi
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sarli; Giovanni Bader; Domenico Iusco; Carlo Salvemini; Davide Di Mauro; Antonio Mazzeo; Gabriele Regina; Luigi Roncoroni
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  C C Compton; L P Fielding; L J Burgart; B Conley; H S Cooper; S R Hamilton; M E Hammond; D E Henson; R V Hutter; R B Nagle; M L Nielsen; D J Sargent; C R Taylor; M Welton; C Willett
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Additional lymph node examination from entire submission of residual mesenteric tissue in colorectal cancer specimens may not add clinical and pathologic relevance.

Authors:  Young Min Kim; Jae Hee Suh; Hee Jeong Cha; Se J Jang; Mi-Jung Kim; Sunoch Yoon; Baekhui Kim; Heejin Chang; Youngmee Kwon; Eun Kyung Hong; Jae Y Ro
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite.

Authors:  Carlos Estrela; Cyntia R A Estrela; Eduardo Luis Barbin; Júlio César E Spanó; Melissa A Marchesan; Jesus D Pécora
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2002

8.  The clinical significance of fat clearance lymph node harvest for invasive rectal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Bashar Safar; Steven D Wexner; Paula Denoya; Mariana Berho
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Methylene blue injection into the rectal artery as a simple method to improve lymph node harvest in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Märkl; Therese G Kerwel; Theodor Wagner; Matthias Anthuber; Hans M Arnholdt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  The influence of the number of retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer undergoing tumor-specific mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Young-Wan Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Byung-Soh Min; Kang-Young Lee; Seung-Kook Sohn; Chang-Hwan Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.