Literature DB >> 9200891

Influence of facial growth pattern on outcome of extraction therapy.

U Hirschfelder1, O Boulouchou, D Müssig, A Fleischer-Peters.   

Abstract

The present clinical-radiological study analyzes orthodontic casts and lateral cephalometric X-rays (at start and finish of orthodontic treatment) of 56 extraction cases, most of them adolescent patients who had 4 teeth extracted. The test group was classified into 3 morphological categories according to growth patterns. For comparison purposes, cephalometric findings of morphologically matching non-extraction groups as well as corresponding data from the literature were used. There was no deepening of overbite in any of the extraction cases in the different test groups. However, an average bite opening of 1.2 mm was found in patients with a neutral or horizontal growth pattern. Irrespective of the growth pattern, a significant increase in anterior and posterior facial height as well as a mean reduction of the ANB angle between 0.9 degrees and 1.3 degrees was found in the different extraction groups. These results matched those of the corresponding nonextraction control groups. At the end of treatment, the longitudinal axis of the upper incisors appeared too steep (retruded). Overall, the individual growth pattern was found to be of very little relevance to treatment results, provided a well considered treatment plan had been drawn up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9200891     DOI: 10.1007/bf02676546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  30 in total

1.  Treatment of Class II, div. 1 malocclusion with the activator and with the Begg technique.

Authors:  L Weichbrodt; B Ingervall
Journal:  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed       Date:  1992

2.  Residual lower first premolar extraction space.

Authors:  M E Richardson
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1990-08

Review 3.  Stability and relapse of dental arch alignment.

Authors:  R M Little
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1990-08

4.  The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of "functional orthodontics".

Authors:  P E Luecke; L E Johnston
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Class II, Division 1 vertical pattern.

Authors:  M E Runge; C Sadowsky
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Facial growth and lower premolar extraction space closure.

Authors:  C D Stephens; W J Houston
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  [Extraction therapy in close bite with inclusion of therapeutic results accomplished with function regulators].

Authors:  R Fränkel
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1968

8.  [Indications for extraction therapy on the basis of teleradiographic findings].

Authors:  H P Bimler
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1967

9.  Comparisons of the dental arch changes in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions: extraction vs nonextraction treatments.

Authors:  S E Bishara; P Bayati; A R Zaher; J R Jakobsen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Effects of first bicuspid extractions on facial height in high-angle cases.

Authors:  C Cusimano; R P McLaughlin; J H Zernik
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1993-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.