Literature DB >> 20640463

Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.

Olivier J C van Vlijmen1, Frits A Rangel, Stefaan J Bergé, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Alfred G Becking, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare measurements on three-dimensional (3D) models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners (CBCT) and to evaluate if the used hardware can influence the performed measurements. CBCT scans of 40 dry human skulls with both the i-CAT and the Iluma cone beam CT scanners were made. From the CBCT scans, 3D models were constructed. One operator identified 19 landmarks five times on both types of 3D models with a time interval of 1 week. Intra-observer reliability was high for most measurements. There was a statistically significant and clinically relevant difference for some measurements between constructed 3D models of the same skull from the two different CBCT devices. Used hardware for scanning might influence the measurements performed. This means that care should be taken when interpreting measurements made on CBCT 3D models derived from different CBCT devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20640463     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0440-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.

Authors:  V Kumar; J B Ludlow; A Mol; L Cevidanes
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leo Lou; Manuel O Lagravere; Sharon Compton; Paul W Major; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-10-27

3.  Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.

Authors:  Olivier J C van Vlijmen; Stefaan J Bergé; Gwen R J Swennen; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Christos Katsaros; Anne M Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.

Authors:  Paolo M Cattaneo; Christian Borgkvist Bloch; Dorte Calmar; Mette Hjortshøj; Birte Melsen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs.

Authors:  Frits A Rangel; Thomas J J Maal; Stefaan J Bergé; Olivier J C van Vlijmen; Joanneke M Plooij; Filip Schutyser; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.

Authors:  O J C van Vlijmen; T Maal; S J Bergé; E M Bronkhorst; C Katsaros; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.

Authors:  Olivier J C van Vlijmen; Thomas J J Maal; Stefaan J Bergé; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Christos Katsaros; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.612

8.  The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements.

Authors:  W J Houston
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1983-05

9.  Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.

Authors:  Maria Alves Garcia Silva; Ulrich Wolf; Frank Heinicke; Axel Bumann; Heiko Visser; Edgar Hirsch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Mazyar Moshiri; William C Scarfe; Michael L Hilgers; James P Scheetz; Anibal M Silveira; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.

Authors:  R Olszewski; L Frison; M Wisniewski; J M Denis; S Vynckier; G Cosnard; F Zech; H Reychler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Exploring CBCT-based DICOM files. A systematic review on the properties of images used to evaluate maxillofacial bone grafts.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Elcio Marcantonio; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Calculating nasoseptal flap dimensions: a cadaveric study using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ellen Ten Dam; Astrid G W Korsten-Meijer; Rutger H Schepers; Wicher J van der Meer; Peter O Gerrits; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Robert A Feijen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Definition of the Region of Interest for the Assessment of Alveolar Bone Repair Using Micro-computed Tomography.

Authors:  Juliana Simeão Borges; Vitor Cardoso Costa; Milena Suemi Irie; Gabriella Lopes de Rezende Barbosa; Rubens Spin-Neto; Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira Soares
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.903

5.  The influence of the segmentation process on 3D measurements from cone beam computed tomography-derived surface models.

Authors:  Willem P Engelbrecht; Zacharias Fourie; Janalt Damstra; Peter O Gerrits; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images.

Authors:  Natalia Zamora; Jose M Llamas; Rosa Cibrián; Jose L Gandia; Vanessa Paredes
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Michael Schauseil; Pawel Pazera; Berna Zorkun; Christos Katsaros; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Three-dimensional surface scanning methods in osteology: A topographical and geometric morphometric comparison.

Authors:  Lukas Waltenberger; Katharina Rebay-Salisbury; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.868

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.