Literature DB >> 36070014

Definition of the Region of Interest for the Assessment of Alveolar Bone Repair Using Micro-computed Tomography.

Juliana Simeão Borges1, Vitor Cardoso Costa1, Milena Suemi Irie1, Gabriella Lopes de Rezende Barbosa2, Rubens Spin-Neto3, Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira Soares4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the extraction socket (distal or lingual root) and the type of region of interest (ROI) definition (manual or predefined) on the assessment of alveolar repair following tooth extraction using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The software package used for scanning, reconstruction, reorientation, and analysis of images (NRecon®, DataViewer®, CT-Analyzer®) was acquired through Bruker <  https://www.bruker.com  > . The sample comprised the micro-CT volumes of seven Wistar rat mandibles, in which the right first molar was extracted. The reconstructed images were analyzed using the extraction sockets, i.e., the distal and intermediate lingual root and the method of ROI definition: manual (MA), central round (CR), and peripheral round (PR). The bone volume fraction (BV/TV) values obtained were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test (α = 5%). The distal extraction socket resulted in significantly lower BV/TV values than the intermediate lingual socket for MA (P = 0.001), CR (P < 0.001), and PR (P < 0.001). Regarding the ROI, when evaluating the distal extraction socket, the BV/TV was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for MA than for CR and PR, with a lower BV/TV for CR. However, no significant difference was observed for MA (P = 0.855), CR (P = 0.769), or PR (P = 0.453) in the intermediate lingual extraction socket. The bone neoformation outcome (BV/TV) for alveolar bone repair after tooth extraction is significantly influenced by the ROI and the extraction socket. Using the predefined method with a standardized ROI in the central region of the distal extraction socket resulted in the assessment of bone volume, demonstrating the most critical region of the bone neoformation process.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar bone; Bone repair; Microcomputed tomography; Region of interest; Tooth extraction

Year:  2022        PMID: 36070014     DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00693-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  44 in total

1.  Grafting of tooth extraction socket with inorganic bovine bone or bioactive glass particles: comparative histometric study in rats.

Authors:  Romeu Felipe Elias Calixto; Juliana Mazzonetto Teófilo; Luiz Guilherme Brentegani; Teresa Lúcia Lamano-Carvalho
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.454

2.  Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery.

Authors:  Casper Kruse; Rubens Spin-Neto; Jesper Reibel; Ann Wenzel; Lise-Lotte Kirkevang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Validation of cortical bone mineral density distribution using micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Maleeha Mashiatulla; Ryan D Ross; D Rick Sumner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Use of Micro-Computed Tomography for Bone Evaluation in Dentistry.

Authors:  Milena Suemi Irie; Gustavo Davi Rabelo; Rubens Spin-Neto; Paula Dechichi; Juliana Simeão Borges; Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira Soares
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2018 May-Jun

5.  Gene expression dynamics during bone healing and osseointegration.

Authors:  Zhao Lin; Hector F Rios; Sarah L Volk; James V Sugai; Qiming Jin; William V Giannobile
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 6.  Genetic and transcriptional control of bone formation.

Authors:  Amjad Javed; Haiyan Chen; Farah Y Ghori
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 7.  Guidelines for Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Rodent Dentoalveolar Tissues.

Authors:  Michael B Chavez; Emily Y Chu; Vardit Kram; Luis F de Castro; Martha J Somerman; Brian L Foster
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-03-03

8.  Postextraction alveolar ridge preservation: biological basis and treatments.

Authors:  Giorgio Pagni; Gaia Pellegrini; William V Giannobile; Giulio Rasperini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-12

9.  Influence of reconstruction parameters of micro-computed tomography on the analysis of bone mineral density.

Authors:  Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Danieli Moura Brasil; Daniela Verardi Madlum; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Christiano Oliveira-Santos
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2020-06-18

10.  Tooth loss is a complex measure of oral disease: Determinants and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Simon Haworth; Dmitry Shungin; So Young Kwak; Hae-Young Kim; Nicola X West; Steven J Thomas; Paul W Franks; Nicholas J Timpson; Min-Jeong Shin; Ingegerd Johansson
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.383

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.