Literature DB >> 18456133

Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.

Maria Alves Garcia Silva1, Ulrich Wolf, Frank Heinicke, Axel Bumann, Heiko Visser, Edgar Hirsch.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Because of the advantages and possibilities of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), orthodontists use this method routinely for patient assessment. The aim of this study was to compare the radiation doses for conventional panoramic and cephalometric imaging with the doses for 2 different CBCT units and a multi-slice CT unit in orthodontic practice.
METHODS: The absorbed organ doses were measured by using an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescent dosimeters at 16 sites related to sensitive organs. The 4 devices (Sirona DS Plus [Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany], i-CAT [Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, Pa], NewTom DVT 9000 [QR, Verona, Italy], and Somatom Sensation [Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany]) were used with standard protocols and, when possible, in the auto-exposure mode. Equivalent and effective doses were calculated. The calculation of the effective doses was based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection's 2005 recommendations.
RESULTS: The lowest organ dose (13.1 microSv) was received by the thyroid gland during conventional panoramic and lateral cephalometric imaging. The highest mean organ dose (15,837.2 microSv) was received by the neck skin from the multi-slice CT. The effective dose was also lower for the panoramic and lateral cephalometric device (10.4 microSv), and highest for the multi-slice CT (429.7 microSv).
CONCLUSIONS: From a radiation-protection point of view, conventional images still deliver the lowest doses to patients. When 3-dimensional imaging is required in orthodontic practice, a CBCT should be preferred over a CT image. Further studies are necessary to justify the routine use of CBCT in orthodontic treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18456133     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  84 in total

1.  Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.

Authors:  U Oz; K Orhan; N Abe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.

Authors:  E L Delamare; G S Liedke; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J L D Ribeiro; H E D Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.

Authors:  Olivier J C van Vlijmen; Frits A Rangel; Stefaan J Bergé; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Alfred G Becking; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics.

Authors:  S Kapila; R S Conley; W E Harrell
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  C Theodorakou; A Walker; K Horner; R Pauwels; R Bogaerts; R Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.

Authors:  Abhishek Gupta; Om Prakash Kharbanda; Viren Sardana; Rajiv Balachandran; Harish Kumar Sardana
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.

Authors:  Luca Signorelli; Raphael Patcas; Timo Peltomäki; Marc Schätzle
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Accuracy of anatomical landmark identification using different CBCT- and MSCT-based 3D images: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jürgen Medelnik; Klaus Hertrich; Stefanie Steinhäuser-Andresen; Ursula Hirschfelder; Elisabeth Hofmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 9.  Clinical guidelines for dental cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Takafumi Hayashi; Yoshinori Arai; Toru Chikui; Sachiko Hayashi-Sakai; Kazuya Honda; Hiroko Indo; Taisuke Kawai; Kaoru Kobayashi; Shumei Murakami; Masako Nagasawa; Munetaka Naitoh; Eiji Nakayama; Yutaka Nikkuni; Hideyoshi Nishiyama; Noriaki Shoji; Shigeaki Suenaga; Ray Tanaka
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics.

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Martin D Levin; David Gane; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.