Literature DB >> 20639753

The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

Yazine Mahjoub1, Jérémie Touzeau, Norair Airapetian, Emmanuel Lorne, Mustapha Hijazi, Elie Zogheib, François Tinturier, Michel Slama, Hervé Dupont.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The passive leg-raising maneuver is a reversible fluid-loading procedure used to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. The aim of the present study was to determine whether intra-abdominal hypertension (which impairs venous return) reduces the ability of passive leg raising to detect fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients.
DESIGN: A prospective study.
SETTING: The medical and surgical intensive care unit of a university medical center. PATIENTS: Forty-one mechanically ventilated patients with a pulse pressure variation of >12%.
INTERVENTIONS: Stroke volume was continuously monitored by esophageal Doppler. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured via bladder pressure. After a passive leg-raising maneuver and a return to baseline, fluid loading with 500 mL of saline was performed. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at each step. Nonresponders to volume loading were not analyzed (10 patients). Thirty-one patients were classified into two groups according to their response to passive leg raising: responders to passive leg raising (at least a 12% increase in stroke volume) and nonresponders to passive leg raising.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen patients (52%) were responders to passive leg raising, and 15 (48%) were nonresponders to passive leg raising (i.e., false negatives). At baseline, the median intra-abdominal pressure was significantly higher in the nonresponders to passive leg raising than in the responders to passive leg raising (20 [6.5] vs. 11.5 [5.5], respectively; p < .0001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.969 +/- 0.033. An intra-abdominal pressure cutoff value of 16 mm Hg discriminated between responders to passive leg raising and nonresponders to passive leg raising with a sensitivity of 100% (confidence interval, 78-100) and a specificity of 87.5% (confidence interval, 61.6-98.1). An intra-abdominal pressure of > or =16 mm Hg was the only independent predictor of nonresponse to passive leg raising in a multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 2.6 [confidence interval, 1.1-6.6]; p = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: An intra-abdominal pressure of > or =16 mm Hg seems to be responsible for false negatives to passive leg raising. Hence, the intra-abdominal pressure should be measured in critically ill ventilated patients, especially before performing passive leg raising.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20639753     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eb3c21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  45 in total

Review 1.  Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Paul Marik; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  New tools for optimizing fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Perrine Bortolotti; Fabienne Saulnier; Delphine Colling; Alban Redheuil; Sebastien Preau
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Understanding preload reserve using functional hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Bedside assessment of passive leg raising effects on venous return.

Authors:  Geoffray Keller; Olivier Desebbe; Marlène Benard; Jean-Baptiste Bouchet; Jean-Jacques Lehot
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Marko Zlicar; Vesna Novak-Jankovic; Rok Blagus; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Limited value of end-expiratory inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness impact of intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Bruno Evrard; Xavier Repessé; Julien Maizel; Christophe Jacob; Marine Goudelin; Cyril Charron; Gwenaël Prat; Michel Slama; Guillaume Geri; Philippe Vignon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Functional hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J-SSCG 2016).

Authors:  Osamu Nishida; Hiroshi Ogura; Moritoki Egi; Seitaro Fujishima; Yoshiro Hayashi; Toshiaki Iba; Hitoshi Imaizumi; Shigeaki Inoue; Yasuyuki Kakihana; Joji Kotani; Shigeki Kushimoto; Yoshiki Masuda; Naoyuki Matsuda; Asako Matsushima; Taka-Aki Nakada; Satoshi Nakagawa; Shin Nunomiya; Tomohito Sadahiro; Nobuaki Shime; Tomoaki Yatabe; Yoshitaka Hara; Kei Hayashida; Yutaka Kondo; Yuka Sumi; Hideto Yasuda; Kazuyoshi Aoyama; Takeo Azuhata; Kent Doi; Matsuyuki Doi; Naoyuki Fujimura; Ryota Fuke; Tatsuma Fukuda; Koji Goto; Ryuichi Hasegawa; Satoru Hashimoto; Junji Hatakeyama; Mineji Hayakawa; Toru Hifumi; Naoki Higashibeppu; Katsuki Hirai; Tomoya Hirose; Kentaro Ide; Yasuo Kaizuka; Tomomichi Kan'o; Tatsuya Kawasaki; Hiromitsu Kuroda; Akihisa Matsuda; Shotaro Matsumoto; Masaharu Nagae; Mutsuo Onodera; Tetsu Ohnuma; Kiyohiro Oshima; Nobuyuki Saito; So Sakamoto; Masaaki Sakuraya; Mikio Sasano; Norio Sato; Atsushi Sawamura; Kentaro Shimizu; Kunihiro Shirai; Tetsuhiro Takei; Muneyuki Takeuchi; Kohei Takimoto; Takumi Taniguchi; Hiroomi Tatsumi; Ryosuke Tsuruta; Naoya Yama; Kazuma Yamakawa; Chizuru Yamashita; Kazuto Yamashita; Takeshi Yoshida; Hiroshi Tanaka; Shigeto Oda
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2018-02-05

9.  Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael J Lanspa; Colin K Grissom; Eliotte L Hirshberg; Jason P Jones; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in severe preeclamptic patients with oliguria.

Authors:  Clément Brun; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Julien Textoris; Laurent Muller; Jean-Pierre Bellefleur; François Antonini; Maxime Tourret; Denis Ortega; Armand Vellin; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Léon Boubli; Florence Bretelle; Claude Martin; Marc Leone
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.