OBJECTIVE: Passive leg raising (PLR) provides a reversible fluid-loading challenge and can be used to predict fluid responsiveness. The amount of blood volume recruited by this maneuver called stressed volume (Vs) is unknown. The present study aims to assess the quantitative effects of passive leg raising on venous return at bedside. METHODS: We conducted a prospective interventional study. Nine mechanically ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients with preserved left ventricular function were enrolled. Cardiac output (CO) was continuously monitored by PiCCO™ via the pulse contour method. Ten second intervals of inspiratory breath holding at four plateau pressures (5, 15, 25 and 35 cm H(2)O) were performed to measure the relationship between blood flow (CO) and central venous pressure (CVP). These were used to determine mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf) and Vs. Patients were studied at three successive steps: semirecumbent position, after PLR and back in the semirecumbent position after volume expansion (VE). RESULTS: Similar to VE, PLR significantly increased Pmsf from 19.7 (17.0-22.6) mmHg at baseline to 22.0 (18.5-27.8) mmHg (p <0.05). CO increased 11.1% (9.5-20) with PLR and 14.8% (4.2-19.9) with VE. Venous return resistance was unchanged throughout the three conditions, whereas the the pressure gradient for venous return (Pmsf-CVP) increased during PLR (p = 0.058) and during VE (p < 0.05). Baseline circulatory compliance was 1.14 (0.52-2.65) ml mm Hg(-1) kg(-1). Vs increased to 3.5 (1.1-3.9) ml kg(-1) with PLR. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of transient hemodynamic changes on venous return induced by passive leg raising can be directly measured in intensive care patients using inspiratory-hold procedures. This technique makes quantification of PLR feasible and could be used clinically to assess fluid responsiveness.
OBJECTIVE: Passive leg raising (PLR) provides a reversible fluid-loading challenge and can be used to predict fluid responsiveness. The amount of blood volume recruited by this maneuver called stressed volume (Vs) is unknown. The present study aims to assess the quantitative effects of passive leg raising on venous return at bedside. METHODS: We conducted a prospective interventional study. Nine mechanically ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients with preserved left ventricular function were enrolled. Cardiac output (CO) was continuously monitored by PiCCO™ via the pulse contour method. Ten second intervals of inspiratory breath holding at four plateau pressures (5, 15, 25 and 35 cm H(2)O) were performed to measure the relationship between blood flow (CO) and central venous pressure (CVP). These were used to determine mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf) and Vs. Patients were studied at three successive steps: semirecumbent position, after PLR and back in the semirecumbent position after volume expansion (VE). RESULTS: Similar to VE, PLR significantly increased Pmsf from 19.7 (17.0-22.6) mmHg at baseline to 22.0 (18.5-27.8) mmHg (p <0.05). CO increased 11.1% (9.5-20) with PLR and 14.8% (4.2-19.9) with VE. Venous return resistance was unchanged throughout the three conditions, whereas the the pressure gradient for venous return (Pmsf-CVP) increased during PLR (p = 0.058) and during VE (p < 0.05). Baseline circulatory compliance was 1.14 (0.52-2.65) ml mm Hg(-1) kg(-1). Vs increased to 3.5 (1.1-3.9) ml kg(-1) with PLR. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of transient hemodynamic changes on venous return induced by passive leg raising can be directly measured in intensive care patients using inspiratory-hold procedures. This technique makes quantification of PLR feasible and could be used clinically to assess fluid responsiveness.
Authors: Bart F Geerts; Jacinta J Maas; Leon P Aarts; Michael R Pinsky; Jos R Jansen Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2010-08-28 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Xavier Monnet; Mario Rienzo; David Osman; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Michael R Pinsky; Jean-Louis Teboul Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Marije Wijnberge; Daniko P Sindhunata; Michael R Pinsky; Alexander P Vlaar; Else Ouweneel; Jos R Jansen; Denise P Veelo; Bart F Geerts Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 6.925