Literature DB >> 24820287

Motor-induced visual motion: hand movements driving visual motion perception.

Mirjam Keetels1, Jeroen J Stekelenburg.   

Abstract

Visual perception can be changed by co-occurring input from other sensory modalities. Here, we explored how self-generated finger movements (left-right or up-down key presses) affect visual motion perception. In Experiment 1, motion perception of a blinking bar was shifted in the direction of co-occurring hand motor movements, indicative of motor-induced visual motion (MIVM). In Experiment 2, moving and static blinking bars were combined with either directional moving or stationary hand motor movements. Results showed that the directional component in the hand movement was crucial for MIVM as stationary motor movements even declined visual motion perception. In Experiment 3, the role of response bias was excluded in a two-alternative forced-choice task that ruled out the effect of response strategies. All three experiments demonstrated that alternating key presses (either horizontally or vertically aligned) induce illusory visual motion and that stationary motor movements (without a vertical or horizontal direction) induce the opposite effect, namely a decline in visual motion (more static) perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24820287     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3959-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard; Ben Whitford
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-03

Review 2.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Sounds can alter the perceived direction of a moving visual object.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita; Shuichi Sakamoto; Jiro Gyoba; Yukio Iwaya; Yôiti Suzuki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Online action-to-perception transfer: only percept-dependent action affects perception.

Authors:  I A M Beets; B M 't Hart; F Rösler; D Y P Henriques; W Einhäuser; K Fiehler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Remapping motion across modalities: tactile rotations influence visual motion judgments.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Roland Thomaschke; Matthias J Linhardt; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception.

Authors:  Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location.

Authors:  S R Williams; J Shenasa; C E Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Interactions between apparent motion rivalry in vision and touch.

Authors:  Verena Conrad; Marco Pino Vitello; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-07-17

9.  Alternation of sound location induces visual motion perception of a static object.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Yuko Manaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita; Ryota Miyauchi; Jiro Gyoba; Yôiti Suzuki; Yukio Iwaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Touch interacts with vision during binocular rivalry with a tight orientation tuning.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Spatiotemporal Processing in Crossmodal Interactions for Perception of the External World: A Review.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.