Literature DB >> 20638404

Spatial contrast sensitivity in dynamic and static additive luminance noise.

J Jason McAnany1, Kenneth R Alexander.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to define the quantitative relationship between the temporal characteristics of additive luminance noise and the properties of the spatial contrast sensitivity function (CSF). CSFs were obtained from two observers using Gabor patch targets of short duration that were added to white luminance noise with a range of root-mean-square contrasts (c(rms)). The noise was either dynamic or static and was either of the same duration as the test target (synchronous) or of longer duration (asynchronous). For targets presented in asynchronous dynamic, synchronous dynamic, and synchronous static noise, the CSFs became increasingly band-pass with increasing c(rms), whereas the CSFs were low-pass at all levels of c(rms) for targets presented in asynchronous static noise. For all noise types, the properties of the CSFs were well-predicted by the linear amplifier model (LAM), in which the signal energy at threshold (E(t)) is related linearly to noise spectral density (N). The fundamentally different characteristics of CSFs obtained in asynchronous static noise can be accounted for by a previous proposal that this noise type biases contrast sensitivity toward transient (inferred magnocellular) mechanisms. The other three modes of noise presentation appear to emphasize detection by sustained (inferred parvocellular) mechanisms. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20638404      PMCID: PMC2926298          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  26 in total

1.  Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers.

Authors:  J Gold; P J Bennett; A B Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Temporal properties of the visual responses to luminance and contrast modulated noise.

Authors:  Velitchko Manahilov; Julie Calvert; William A Simpson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spatial frequency processing in inferred PC- and MC-pathways.

Authors:  Anna Leonova; Joel Pokorny; Vivianne C Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Noise provides some new signals about the spatial vision of amblyopes.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision.

Authors:  J J Kulikowski; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Contrast discrimination in noise.

Authors:  G E Legge; D Kersten; A E Burgess
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

8.  Factors limiting contrast sensitivity in experimentally amblyopic macaque monkeys.

Authors:  L Kiorpes; C Tang; J A Movshon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination.

Authors:  D H Parish; G Sperling
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  11 in total

1.  Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.

Authors:  Cierra Hall; Shu Wang; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Functional loss in the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in patients with optic neuritis.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Andrew J Zele; Joel Pokorny; David Y Lee; Leonard V Messner; Christopher Diehl; Susan Ksiazek
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The external noise normalized gain profile of spatial vision.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Reduced Contrast Sensitivity is Associated With Elevated Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in Type 2 Diabetics Who Have Mild or No Retinopathy.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Equivalent intrinsic noise, sampling efficiency, and contrast sensitivity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Kenneth R Alexander; Mohamed A Genead; Gerald A Fishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Contrast Sensitivity and Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in X-Linked Retinoschisis.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park; Gerald A Fishman; Robert A Hyde
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Noise provides new insights on contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Ge Chen; Fang Hou; Fang-Fang Yan; Pan Zhang; Jie Xi; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of luminance noise on the object frequencies mediating letter identification.

Authors:  Cierra Hall; Shu Wang; Reema Bhagat; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-03

9.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Daniel H Baker; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Luminance noise as a novel approach for measuring contrast sensitivity within the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways.

Authors:  Cierra M Hall; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.