Literature DB >> 3559785

Contrast discrimination in noise.

G E Legge, D Kersten, A E Burgess.   

Abstract

Even the highest contrast sensitivities that humans can achieve for the detection of targets on uniform fields fall far short of ideal values. Recent theoretical formulations have attributed departures from ideal performance to two factors--the existence of internal noise within the observer and suboptimal stimulus information sampling by the observer. It has been postulated that the contributions of these two factors can be evaluated separately by measuring contrast-detection thresholds as a function of the level of externally added visual noise. We wished to determine whether a similar analysis could be applied to contrast discrimination and whether variation of the increment threshold with pedestal contrast is due to changes in internal noise or sampling efficiency. We measured contrast-increment thresholds as a function of noise spectral density for near-threshold and suprathreshold pedestal contrasts. The experiments were conducted separately for static and dynamic noise. Our findings indicate that the same formulation can be applied to contrast discrimination and that changes in the estimated values of internal noise, rather than changes in sampling efficiency, play the major role in determining properties of contrast discrimination. Implications for models of contrast coding in vision are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3559785     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.000391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  46 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The absolute threshold of cone vision.

Authors:  Darren Koenig; Heidi Hofer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Learning letter identification in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Dennis M Levi; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Do common mechanisms of adaptation mediate color discrimination and appearance? Uniform backgrounds.

Authors:  James M Hillis; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Uncertainty and invariance in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Vaia Lestou; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Reduction in direction discrimination with age and slow speed is due to both increased internal noise and reduced sampling efficiency.

Authors:  Lotte-Guri Bogfjellmo; Peter J Bex; Helle K Falkenberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  A visual or tactile signal makes auditory speech detection more efficient by reducing uncertainty.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Ewen Chao; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Efficient integration across spatial frequencies for letter identification in foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Relearning to See in Cortical Blindness.

Authors:  Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.