Literature DB >> 23661376

Equivalent intrinsic noise, sampling efficiency, and contrast sensitivity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

J Jason McAnany1, Kenneth R Alexander, Mohamed A Genead, Gerald A Fishman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relationships among equivalent intrinsic noise (Neq), sampling efficiency, and contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), where Neq is an estimate of the amount of noise within the visual pathway and sampling efficiency represents the subject's ability to use stimulus information optimally.
METHODS: Participants included 10 patients with RP aged 10 to 54 years, who had visual acuities of 20/40 or better, and 10 visually normal control subjects aged 22 to 65 years. CS was measured for 2-cycles-per-degree Gabor patch targets presented in the absence of noise (CS0) and in five levels of noise spectral density. Data were fit with a standard linear amplifier model, which provided estimates of Neq and sampling efficiency.
RESULTS: CS0 for the patients ranged from normal to as much as a factor of 3 below the lower limit of normal. All 10 patients had abnormally high Neq, including two patients with normal CS0. In comparison, only two patients had lower-than-normal sampling efficiency, and these two patients also had below-normal CS0. Log CS0 for the patients was correlated significantly with log Neq (r = -0.80, P < 0.05), but not with log efficiency (r = 0.54, P = 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Low CS was associated with elevated intrinsic noise in this group of RP patients, but even patients with normal CS had elevated noise levels. The results suggest that CS measurement in both the presence and absence of luminance noise can provide important information about visual dysfunction in RP patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast sensitivity; retinitis pigmentosa; visual noise

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23661376      PMCID: PMC3671935          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-11789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  26 in total

1.  Effects of aging on calculation efficiency and equivalent noise.

Authors:  P J Bennett; A B Sekuler; L Ozin
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise.

Authors:  Z L Lu; B A Dosher
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Temporal properties of the visual responses to luminance and contrast modulated noise.

Authors:  Velitchko Manahilov; Julie Calvert; William A Simpson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Dennis M Levi; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Contrast sensitivity for letter optotypes vs. gratings under conditions biased toward parvocellular and magnocellular pathways.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Kenneth R Alexander
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Developmental time course distinguishes changes in spontaneous and light-evoked retinal ganglion cell activity in rd1 and rd10 mice.

Authors:  Steven F Stasheff; Malini Shankar; Michael P Andrews
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Contrast sensitivity deficits in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Kenneth R Alexander; Claire S Barnes; Gerald A Fishman; Joel Pokorny; Vivianne C Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Spatial contrast sensitivity in dynamic and static additive luminance noise.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Kenneth R Alexander
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Contrast thresholds in additive luminance noise: Effect of noise temporal characteristics.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Kenneth R Alexander
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Robert E Marc; Bryan W Jones; Carl B Watt; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 21.198

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reduced Contrast Sensitivity is Associated With Elevated Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in Type 2 Diabetics Who Have Mild or No Retinopathy.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Abnormal stereopsis and reduced retinal sensitivity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Enzo Maria Vingolo; Paolo Giuseppe Limoli; Robert Davis Jr Steigerwalt; Sandra Cinzia Carlesimo; Serena Salvatore
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Increased Equivalent Input Noise in Glaucomatous Central Vision: Is it Due to Undersampling of Retinal Ganglion Cells?

Authors:  Rong Liu; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Contrast Sensitivity and Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in X-Linked Retinoschisis.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park; Gerald A Fishman; Robert A Hyde
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Effect of luminance noise on the object frequencies mediating letter identification.

Authors:  Cierra Hall; Shu Wang; Reema Bhagat; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-03

6.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Daniel H Baker; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Clinical Impact of Spontaneous Hyperactivity in Degenerating Retinas: Significance for Diagnosis, Symptoms, and Treatment.

Authors:  Steven F Stasheff
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.505

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.