Literature DB >> 20636356

Artificial selection on egg size perturbs early pattern formation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Cecelia M Miles1, Susan E Lott, Cris L Luengo Hendriks, Michael Z Ludwig, Calvin L Williams, Martin Kreitman.   

Abstract

Pattern formation in Drosophila embryogenesis has been widely investigated as a developmental and evolutionary model of robustness. To ask whether genetic variation for pattern formation is suppressed in this system, artificial selection for divergent egg size was used to challenge the scaling of even-skipped (eve) pattern formation in mitotic cycle 14 (stage 5) embryos of Drosophila melanogaster. Three-dimensional confocal imaging revealed shifts in the allometry of eve pair-rule stripes along both anterior–posterior (A–P) and dorsoventral (D–V) axes as a correlated response to egg size selection, indicating the availability of genetic variation for this buffered trait. Environmental perturbation was not required for the manifestation of this variation. The number of nuclei at the cellular blastoderm stage also changed in response to selection, with large-egg selected lines having more than 1000 additional nuclei relative to small-egg lines. This increase in nuclear number in larger eggs does not scale with egg size, however, as nuclear density is inversely correlated with egg length. Nuclear density varies along the A–P axis but does not correlate with the shift in eve stripe allometry between the selection treatments. Despite its macroevolutionary conservation, both eve stripe patterning and blastoderm cell number vary genetically both within and between closely related species.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20636356      PMCID: PMC2988983          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01088.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  33 in total

1.  Analysis of dynamic morphogen scale invariance.

Authors:  David M Umulis
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner.

Authors:  W Driever; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Genes affecting the segmental subdivision of the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  C Nüsslein-Volhard; H Kluding; G Jürgens
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1985

4.  The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xvi. Excess of Additive Genetic Variance of Viability.

Authors:  T Mukai; S Nagano
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Independence of fushi tarazu expression with respect to cellular density in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  W Sullivan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 May 14-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Canalization of segmentation and its evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Susan E Lott; Martin Kreitman; Arnar Palsson; Elena Alekseeva; Michael Z Ludwig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Size regulation in the segmentation of Drosophila: interacting interfaces between localized domains of gene expression ensure robust spatial patterning.

Authors:  Sergei Vakulenko; John Reinitz; Ovidiu Radulescu
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Shape and function of the Bicoid morphogen gradient in dipteran species with different sized embryos.

Authors:  Thomas Gregor; Alistair P McGregor; Eric F Wieschaus
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Three-dimensional morphology and gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm at cellular resolution I: data acquisition pipeline.

Authors:  Cris L Luengo Hendriks; Soile V E Keränen; Charless C Fowlkes; Lisa Simirenko; Gunther H Weber; Angela H DePace; Clara Henriquez; David W Kaszuba; Bernd Hamann; Michael B Eisen; Jitendra Malik; Damir Sudar; Mark D Biggin; David W Knowles
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Functional evolution of a cis-regulatory module.

Authors:  Michael Z Ludwig; Arnar Palsson; Elena Alekseeva; Casey M Bergman; Janaki Nathan; Martin Kreitman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  21 in total

1.  Reproductive Capacity Evolves in Response to Ecology through Common Changes in Cell Number in Hawaiian Drosophila.

Authors:  Didem P Sarikaya; Samuel H Church; Laura P Lagomarsino; Karl N Magnacca; Steven L Montgomery; Donald K Price; Kenneth Y Kaneshiro; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Mechanisms of scaling in pattern formation.

Authors:  David M Umulis; Hans G Othmer
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Mechanism and implications of morphogen shuttling: Lessons learned from dorsal and Cactus in Drosophila.

Authors:  Allison E Schloop; Sophia Carrell-Noel; Jeramey Friedman; Alexander Thomas; Gregory T Reeves
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Morphogen gradient formation and action: insights from studying Bicoid protein degradation.

Authors:  Junbo Liu; Feng He; Jun Ma
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.160

5.  Size-dependent regulation of dorsal-ventral patterning in the early Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Mayra Garcia; Marcos Nahmad; Gregory T Reeves; Angelike Stathopoulos
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Scaling of the Bicoid morphogen gradient by a volume-dependent production rate.

Authors:  David Cheung; Cecelia Miles; Martin Kreitman; Jun Ma
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 7.  Integrating cellular dimensions with cell differentiation during early development.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Wenchao Qian; Matthew C Good
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 8.382

8.  Evolution and inheritance of early embryonic patterning in Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.

Authors:  Susan E Lott; Michael Z Ludwig; Martin Kreitman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Natural variation of the expression pattern of the segmentation gene even-skipped in melanogaster.

Authors:  Pengyao Jiang; Michael Z Ludwig; Martin Kreitman; John Reinitz
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Adaptation of the length scale and amplitude of the Bicoid gradient profile to achieve robust patterning in abnormally large Drosophila melanogaster embryos.

Authors:  David Cheung; Cecelia Miles; Martin Kreitman; Jun Ma
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.