Literature DB >> 20632044

Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part II. No clinical benefit for asymptomatic, initially degenerated adjacent segments after 6 years follow-up.

Michael Putzier1, Eike Hoff, Stephan Tohtz, Christian Gross, Carsten Perka, Patrick Strube.   

Abstract

Progression of degeneration is often described in patients with initially degenerated segment adjacent to fusion (iASD) at the time of surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare dynamic fixation of a clinically asymptomatic iASD, with circumferential lumbar fusion alone. 60 patients with symptomatic degeneration of L5/S1 or L4/L5 (Modic ≥ 2°) and asymptomatic iASD (Modic = 1°, confirmed by discography) were divided into two groups. 30 patients were treated with circumferential single-level fusion (SLF). In dynamic fixation transition (DFT) patients, additional posterior dynamic fixation of iASD was performed. Preoperatively, at 12 months, and at a mean follow-up of 76.4 (60-91) months, radiological (MRI, X-ray) and clinical (ODI, VAS, satisfaction) evaluations assessed fusion, progression of adjacent segment degeneration (PASD), radiologically adverse events, functional outcome, and pain. At final follow-up, two non-fusions were observed in both groups. 6 SLF patients and 1 DFT patient presented a PASD. In two DFT patients, a PASD occurred in the segment superior to the dynamic fixation, and in one DFT patient, a fusion of the dynamically fixated segment was observed. 4 DFT patients presented radiological implant failure. While no differences in clinical scores were observed between groups, improvement from pre-operative conditions was significant (all p < 0.001). Clinical scores were equal in patients with PASD and/or radiologically adverse events. We do not recommend dynamically fixating the adjacent segment in patients with clinically asymptomatic iASD. The lower number of PASD with dynamic fixation was accompanied by a high number of implant failures and a shift of PASD to the superior segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632044      PMCID: PMC2997202          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1517-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  39 in total

1.  Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages.

Authors:  Edward R G Santos; David G Goss; Russel K Morcom; Robert D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment.

Authors:  W Schmoelz; J F Huber; T Nydegger; L Claes; H J Wilke
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

3.  Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Gary Ghiselli; Jeffrey C Wang; Nitin N Bhatia; Wellington K Hsu; Edgar G Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Imaging of degenerative disk disease.

Authors:  M T Modic; T J Masaryk; J S Ross; J R Carter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability.

Authors:  P R Dupuis; K Yong-Hing; J D Cassidy; W H Kirkaldy-Willis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

7.  Results after anterior-posterior lumbar spinal fusion: 2-5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Thomas Niemeyer; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Henry Halm; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparison of dynamic posteroanterior spinal stiffness to plain film radiographic images of lumbar disk height.

Authors:  Christopher J Colloca; Tony S Keller; Terry K Peterson; Daryn E Seltzer
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  M Penta; A Sandhu; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Posterolateral lumbosacral fusion with transpedicular fixation: 63 consecutive cases followed for 4 (2-6) years.

Authors:  H Pihlajamäki; O Böstman; M Ruuskanen; P Myllynen; J Kinnunen; E Karaharju
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-02
View more
  32 in total

1.  Hybrid Surgery Combined with Dynamic Stabilization System and Fusion for the Multilevel Degenerative Disease of the Lumbosacral Spine.

Authors:  Soo Eon Lee; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun Jib Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-08-28

2.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  A phased rehabilitation protocol for athletes with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  Leonard H Vangelder; Barbara J Hoogenboom; Daniel W Vaughn
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

Review 4.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2010.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Material failure in dynamic spine implants: are the standardized implant tests before market launch sufficient?

Authors:  Stavros Oikonomidis; Rolf Sobottke; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Herren; Agnes Beckmann; Kourosh Zarghooni; Jan Siewe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Does hybrid fixation prevent junctional disease after posterior fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders? A minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Andrea Baioni; Mario Di Silvestre; Tiziana Greggi; Francesco Vommaro; Francesco Lolli; Antonio Scarale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Biomechanical investigation of lumbar hybrid stabilization in two-level posterior instrumentation.

Authors:  Aldemar Andres Hegewald; Sebastian Hartmann; Alexander Keiler; Kai Michael Scheufler; Claudius Thomé; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Li-Xin Guo; Dan Zhao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Late infections after dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with Dynesys.

Authors:  Jon A Lutz; Philippe Otten; Gianluca Maestretti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Hybrid stabilization technique with spinal fusion and interlaminar device to reduce the length of fusion and to protect symptomatic adjacent segments : Clinical long-term follow-up].

Authors:  C Fleege; M Rickert; I Werner; M Rauschmann; M Arabmotlagh
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.