Literature DB >> 7604353

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

M Penta1, A Sandhu, R D Fraser.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: One-hundred-eight patients from a consecutive series of 125 anterior lumbar interbody fusions were invited to participate in a radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging assessment more than 10 years after the original surgery.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term incidence of disc degeneration adjacent to an anterior interbody fusion and to determine whether this was influenced by the length of the fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Biomechanical studies in human cadaver spines support the view that fusion in the lumbar spine is likely to be associated with an increased incidence of degeneration at adjacent levels, but there is little reliable information on the incidence of juxtafusion degeneration from the few long-term studies of lumbar spine fusion reported in the literature.
METHODS: Eighty-seven patients agreed to take part in the study, but in six cases the magnetic resonance imaging procedure had to be abandoned. Of the 81 patients who underwent both radiographic assessment and magnetic resonance imaging scanning, preoperative discography had demonstrated a normal disc above the level of the fusion in 52. This group of patients formed the basis of this report. Each sequence of magnetic resonance imaging films was examined by one radiologist. The signal strength was assessed on T2-weighted images in the sagittal plane and disc morphology was assessed on T1- and T2-weighted sagittal and T1-weighted axial images. Fusion status was assessed on the plain films and magnetic resonance imaging.
RESULTS: The incidence of a normal adjacent intervertebral disc in cases of solid fusions to the sacrum was 68%. This was not influenced by the length of the fusion.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that degeneration after an anterior lumbar interbody fusion is determined more by individual characteristics than by the fusion itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7604353     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199503150-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  46 in total

1.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Stephan Tohtz; Eike Hoff; Christian Gross; Carsten Perka; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Analysis of biomechanical changes after removal of instrumentation in lumbar arthrodesis by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Seong-Hwan Moon; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hak-Sun Kim; Jin-Oh Park; Eun-Su Moon; Joon-Seok Sohn; Hwan-Mo Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  [Long-term results of the Dynesys implant].

Authors:  C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Changes in the adjacent segment 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Hyeong-Ki Shim; Yong Ahn; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Qingan Zhu; Eyal Itshayek; Claire F Jones; Timothy Schwab; Chadwick R Larson; Lawrence G Lenke; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration.

Authors:  Per Ekman; Hans Möller; Adel Shalabi; Yiang Xiao Yu; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Risk factors for adjacent segment disease development after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Sergei Masevnin; Dmitry Ptashnikov; Dmitry Michaylov; Hao Meng; Oleg Smekalenkov; Nikita Zaborovskii
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 9.  Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Tue Secher Jensen; Jaro Karppinen; Joan S Sorensen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Lumbar disc degeneration below a long arthrodesis (performed for scoliosis in adults) to L4 or L5.

Authors:  Ian J Harding; Sebastian Charosky; Raphael Vialle; Daniel H Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.