Literature DB >> 20630015

Automated calculation of symmetry measure on clinical photographs.

Mugdha Dabeer1, Edward Kim, Gregory P Reece, Fatima Merchant, Melissa A Crosby, Elisabeth K Beahm, Mia K Markey.   

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: The quality of life of breast cancer survivors is ameliorated by minimizing adverse effects on their physical appearance. Breast reconstruction is important for restoring the survivor's appearance. In breast reconstructive surgery, there is a need to develop technologies for quantifying surgical outcomes and understanding women's perceptions of changes in their appearance. Methods for objectively measuring breast anatomy are needed in order to help breast cancer survivors, radiation oncologists and surgeons quantify changes in appearance that occur with different breast reconstructive surgical options.
METHODS: In this study, we present an automated method for computing a variant of the normalized Breast Retraction Assessment, a common measure of symmetry, from routine clinical photographs taken to document breast cancer treatment procedures. The algorithms were designed using a development set of retrospectively collected clinical photographs and evaluated using a separate test set of prospectively collected clinical photographs.
RESULTS: We have developed new algorithms for automatically localizing the umbilicus and nipples on standard anterior-posterior clinical photographs, enabling the automatic calculation of measure of breast symmetry.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that under standardized photographic conditions, automatic localization of fiducial points and subsequent computation of measures, such as symmetry, is feasible. The algorithms presented here for quantifying surgical outcomes in breast reconstructive surgery will provide a foundation for future work on assisting a cancer patient and her surgeons in selecting and planning reconstruction procedures that will maximize the woman's psychosocial adjustment to life as a breast cancer survivor.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630015      PMCID: PMC2958233          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01477.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  9 in total

1.  Achieving standardized photographs in aesthetic surgery.

Authors:  R Ellenbogen; S Jankauskas; F J Collini
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Objective assessment of aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: measuring ptosis from clinical photographs.

Authors:  Min Soon Kim; Gregory P Reece; Elisabeth K Beahm; Michael J Miller; E Neely Atkinson; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 3.  Assessment of breast aesthetics.

Authors:  Min Soon Kim; Juliano C Sbalchiero; Gregory P Reece; Michael J Miller; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Towards quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: comparison of clinical photography and colorimetry.

Authors:  Min Soon Kim; William N Rodney; Tara Cooper; Chris Kite; Gregory P Reece; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system.

Authors:  E Van Limbergen; E van der Schueren; K Van Tongelen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  The influence of the boost in breast-conserving therapy on cosmetic outcome in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  C Vrieling; L Collette; A Fourquet; W J Hoogenraad; J C Horiot; J J Jager; M Pierart; P M Poortmans; H Struikmans; M Van der Hulst; E Van der Schueren; H Bartelink
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Cosmetic outcome of breast conserving therapy after sentinel node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection.

Authors:  H F J Fabry; B M Zonderhuis; S Meijer; J Berkhof; P A M Van Leeuwen; J R M Van der Sijp
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Pezner; M P Patterson; L R Hill; N Vora; K R Desai; J O Archambeau; J A Lipsett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A research agenda for appearance changes due to breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Mugdha Dabeer; Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Fatima Merchant; Gregory P Reece; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2008-06-16
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Automated calculation of ptosis on lateral clinical photographs.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Edward Kim; Gregory P Reece; Melissa A Crosby; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  A shape constrained parametric active contour model for breast contour detection.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Gautam S Muralidhar; Gregory P Reece; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

3.  Automated Identification of Fiducial Points on 3D Torso Images.

Authors:  Manas M Kawale; Gregory P Reece; Melissa A Crosby; Elisabeth K Beahm; Michelle C Fingeret; Mia K Markey; Fatima A Merchant
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2013-07-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.