RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Scarring is a significant cause of dissatisfaction for women who undergo breast surgery. Scar tissue may be clinically distinguished from normal skin by aberrant colour, rough surface texture, increased thickness (hypertrophy) and firmness. Colorimeters or spectrophotometers can be used to quantitatively assess scar colour, but they require direct patient interaction and can cost thousands of dollars. By comparison, digital photography is already in widespread use to document clinical outcomes and requires less patient interaction. Thus, assessment of scar coloration by digital photography is an attractive alternative. The goal of this study was to compare colour measurements obtained by digital photography and colorimetry. METHODS: Agreements between photographic and colorimetric measurements of colour were evaluated. Experimental conditions were controlled by performing measurements on artificial scars created by a make-up artist. The colorimetric measurements of the artificial scars were compared with those reported in the literature for real scars in order to confirm the validity of this approach. We assessed the agreement between the colorimetric and photographic measurements of colour using a hypothesis test for equivalence, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Overall, good agreement was obtained for three parameters (L*a*b*) measured by colorimetry and photography from the results of three statistical analyses. CONCLUSION: Colour measurements obtained by digital photography were equivalent to those obtained using colorimetry. Thus, digital photography is a reliable, cost-effective measurement method of skin colour and should be further investigated for quantitative analysis of surgical outcomes.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Scarring is a significant cause of dissatisfaction for women who undergo breast surgery. Scar tissue may be clinically distinguished from normal skin by aberrant colour, rough surface texture, increased thickness (hypertrophy) and firmness. Colorimeters or spectrophotometers can be used to quantitatively assess scar colour, but they require direct patient interaction and can cost thousands of dollars. By comparison, digital photography is already in widespread use to document clinical outcomes and requires less patient interaction. Thus, assessment of scar coloration by digital photography is an attractive alternative. The goal of this study was to compare colour measurements obtained by digital photography and colorimetry. METHODS: Agreements between photographic and colorimetric measurements of colour were evaluated. Experimental conditions were controlled by performing measurements on artificial scars created by a make-up artist. The colorimetric measurements of the artificial scars were compared with those reported in the literature for real scars in order to confirm the validity of this approach. We assessed the agreement between the colorimetric and photographic measurements of colour using a hypothesis test for equivalence, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Overall, good agreement was obtained for three parameters (L*a*b*) measured by colorimetry and photography from the results of three statistical analyses. CONCLUSION: Colour measurements obtained by digital photography were equivalent to those obtained using colorimetry. Thus, digital photography is a reliable, cost-effective measurement method of skin colour and should be further investigated for quantitative analysis of surgical outcomes.
Authors: Bishara S Atiyeh; John Ioannovich; Christian A Al-Amm; Kusai A El-Musa; Ruwayda Dham Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.326
Authors: Pauline T Truong; Freddy Abnousi; Celina M Yong; Allen Hayashi; James A Runkel; Theressa Phillips; Ivo A Olivotto Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Lieneke J Draaijers; Fenike R H Tempelman; Yvonne A M Botman; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Esther Middelkoop; Robert W Kreis; Paul P M van Zuijlen Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Min Soon Kim; Angela Burgess; Andrew J Waters; Gregory P Reece; Elisabeth K Beahm; Melissa A Crosby; Karen M Basen-Engquist; Mia K Markey Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Mugdha Dabeer; Edward Kim; Gregory P Reece; Fatima Merchant; Melissa A Crosby; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Mugdha Dabeer; Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Fatima Merchant; Gregory P Reece; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey Journal: Breast Cancer (Auckl) Date: 2008-06-16
Authors: Juhun Lee; Manas Kawale; Fatima A Merchant; June Weston; Michelle C Fingeret; Dianne Ladewig; Gregory P Reece; Melissa A Crosby; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey Journal: Breast Cancer (Auckl) Date: 2011-02-15