Literature DB >> 20629924

What is the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate among nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset?

Jeremy L Neal1, Nancy K Lowe, Thelma E Patrick, Lori A Cabbage, Elizabeth J Corwin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To integrate research literature that has provided insights into the cervical dilation rate that may best describe the slowest-yet-normal dilation rate among nulliparous women when beginning with criteria commonly associated with active labor onset. DATA SOURCES: A literature search from 1950 through 2008 was conducted using the Medline electronic database, reference lists from identified articles, and other key references. STUDY SELECTION: Research reports written in English with a focus on the cervical dilation and/or labor duration of low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. DATA EXTRACTION: Classic and contemporary research literature was reviewed and organized under the following subheadings: Friedman Studies, Partograph Studies, Active Management of Labor Studies, Additional Studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: An integrative review of the literature approximated the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate for nulliparous women when beginning with criteria commonly associated with active labor.
CONCLUSIONS: The slowest-yet-normal linear dilation rate approximates 0.5 cm/hour for low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset when starting at dilatations traditionally associated with active labor onset. However, this linear rate must be evaluated judiciously in light of the physiological acceleration of dilation that occurs during typical labor. Given this, cervical dilation for this population is likely slower than 0.5 cm/hour in earlier active labor and faster in more advanced active labor. Faster dilation expectations (e.g., 1 cm/hour) likely contribute to an overdiagnosis of dystocia ("slow, abnormal progression of labor") in contemporary practice and, subsequently, to an overuse of interventions aimed at accelerating labor progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20629924      PMCID: PMC2928658          DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01154.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  31 in total

1.  Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James F Troendle; Michael K Yancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Impact of early admission in labor on method of delivery.

Authors:  P Rahnama; S Ziaei; S Faghihzadeh
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  The duration of labor in healthy women.

Authors:  L L Albers
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement.

Authors:  Elliott K Main; Dan Moore; Bill Farrell; Leon D Schimmel; Robert J Altman; Carol Abrahams; Mary Campbell Bliss; Laurie Polivy; Jacci Sterling
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Length of normal labor in women of Hispanic origin.

Authors:  Marcia Jones; Elaine Larson
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention.

Authors:  P Holmes; L W Oppenheimer; S W Wen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bailit; LeRoy Dierker; May Hsieh Blanchard; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Oxytocin: new perspectives on an old drug.

Authors:  Steven L Clark; Kathleen Rice Simpson; G Eric Knox; Thomas J Garite
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women.

Authors:  Heather C Brown; Shantini Paranjothy; Therese Dowswell; Jane Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

10.  Evaluating progress of labor in nulliparas and multiparas using the modified WHO partograph.

Authors:  Ernest Orji
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.561

View more
  13 in total

1.  Supporting Healthy and Normal Physiologic Childbirth: A Consensus Statement by ACNM, MANA, and NACPM.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Antispasmodics for labour.

Authors:  Anke C Rohwer; Oswell Khondowe; Taryn Young
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-05

3.  A qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences of labor dystocia.

Authors:  Katherine Kissler; Jacqueline Jones; A Kristienne McFarland; Jacalyn Luchsinger
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Physiologic partograph to improve birth safety and outcomes among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Labor Pattern Among Primigravida in Local Population.

Authors:  Nivethitha Pitchaimuthu; Shanta Bhaskaran
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-12-22

6.  The development of a Simplified, Effective, Labour Monitoring-to-Action (SELMA) tool for Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD): study protocol.

Authors:  João Paulo Souza; Olufemi T Oladapo; Meghan A Bohren; Kidza Mugerwa; Bukola Fawole; Leonardo Moscovici; Domingos Alves; Gleici Perdona; Livia Oliveira-Ciabati; Joshua P Vogel; Özge Tunçalp; Jim Zhang; Justus Hofmeyr; Rajiv Bahl; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway.

Authors:  Stine Bernitz; Rebecka Dalbye; Pål Øian; Jun Zhang; Torbjørn Moe Eggebø; Ellen Blix
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Serum lactate dehydrogenase profile as a retrospective indicator of uterine preparedness for labor: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  A pilot study to determine the feasibility of collecting amniotic fluid samples from women during labour and measuring amniotic fluid lactate at point of care.

Authors:  Beverley Hall; Jenna Iwasenko; Mary Moriatis; William D Rawlinson; Mark B Tracy; Sally K Tracy
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-03-26

10.  High proportions of obstetric referrals in Addis Ababa: the case of term premature rupture of membranes.

Authors:  Alemnesh H Mirkuzie; Mitike Molla Sisay; Mulu Muleta Bedane
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.