Literature DB >> 15625145

Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor.

Jennifer L Bailit1, LeRoy Dierker, May Hsieh Blanchard, Brian M Mercer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcome differences between women presenting in latent and active labor.
METHODS: We evaluated all low-risk women with term, singleton, vertex gestations who presented in active phase or latent phase labor at MetroHealth Medical Center from January 1993 to June 2001. Baseline characteristics were compared. Labor outcomes were assessed by logistic regression, controlling for parity.
RESULTS: A total of 6,121 active phase and 2,697 latent phase women met the study criteria. More latent phase women were nulliparous (51 compared with 28%). Latent phase women had more cesarean deliveries (nulliparas 14.2% compared with 6.7%, multiparas 3.1% compared with 1.4%). Controlling for parity, latent phase women had more active phase arrest (odds ratio [OR] 2.2), oxytocin use (OR 2.3), scalp pH performed (OR 2.2), intrauterine pressure catheter placed (OR = 2.2), fetal scalp electrocardiogram monitoring (OR = 1.7), and amnionitis (OR 2.7) (P < .001 for each).
CONCLUSION: It is uncertain whether inherent labor abnormalities resulted in latent phase presentation and subsequent physician intervention or early presentation and subsequent physician intervention are the cause of labor abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15625145     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000147843.12196.00

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  27 in total

1.  Applying a physiologic partograph to Consortium on Safe Labor data to identify opportunities for safely decreasing cesarean births among nulliparous women.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Aaron B Caughey; Kelly A Bennett; Ellen L Tilden; Nicole S Carlson; Julia C Phillippi; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 2.  Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.

Authors:  Shinobu Kobayashi; Nobutsugu Hanada; Masayo Matsuzaki; Kenji Takehara; Erika Ota; Hatoko Sasaki; Chie Nagata; Rintaro Mori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  Describing latent phase duration and associated characteristics among 1281 low-risk women in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Mia Ahlberg; Tekoa L King; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Jonathan M Snowden; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 4.  What is the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate among nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset?

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Thelma E Patrick; Lori A Cabbage; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

5.  Physiologic partograph to improve birth safety and outcomes among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.538

6.  Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Jane M Lamp; Nancy K Lowe; Shannon L Gillespie; Loraine T Sinnott; Donna O McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Outcomes of nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset admitted to hospitals in preactive versus active labor.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Jane M Lamp; Jacalyn S Buck; Nancy K Lowe; Shannon L Gillespie; Sharon L Ryan
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Likelihood of cesarean birth among parous women after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Julia C Phillippi; Nicole S Carlson; Amy M Knupp; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.372

9.  Adverse Perinatal Outcomes Predicted by Prenatal Maternal Stress Among U.S. Women at the COVID-19 Pandemic Onset.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Brittain Mahaffey; Susmita Pati; Cassandra Heiselman; Marci Lobel
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-20

10.  Serum lactate dehydrogenase profile as a retrospective indicator of uterine preparedness for labor: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.