Literature DB >> 11762649

The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention.

P Holmes1, L W Oppenheimer, S W Wen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the cervical dilatation at which women present in labour and the subsequent likelihood of caesarean section.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: University teaching hospital. POPULATION: 3,220 women met the entry criteria from 14,050 deliveries between January 1995 and December 1999.
METHODS: Women meeting the following criteria were identified: those in spontaneous labour with a singleton pregnancy and a cephalic presentation at 37-42 weeks of gestation; all women delivering within 36 hours of first presentation were included. Women who had spontaneous rupture of the membranes before first attendance were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of caesarean section. Secondary outcomes were operative vaginal delivery, fetal weight, cord pH, five minute Apgar score, length of labour, labour augmentation with oxytocin and epidural analgesia.
RESULTS: The risk of caesarean section decreased with increasing cervical dilatation at presentation. This was true for nulliparous (n = 1,168) and parous women (n = 2,052). The caesarean section rate of nulliparous women presenting at 0-3cm (n = 812) was 10.3%, compared with 4.2% for those presenting at 4cm-10 cm (n = 356), and the mean duration of labour before presentation was 2.0 hours versus 4.5 hours, respectively (P = 0.0001). For parous women the caesarean section rates were 5.7% and 1.3%, respectively (P = 0.0001). There were significantly greater frequencies of use of oxytocin and epidural analgesia by women presenting earlier in labour. The caesarean section rate of 185 nulliparae (15.8%) who were initially allowed home was no different from those admitted immediately (9.2% vs 8.2%, P = 0.67). Similarly, 196 (9.5%) of multiparae went home and had a caesarean section rate of 3.6%, compared with 3.1% if admitted immediately (P = 0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Women who present to hospital at 0-3cm spend less time in labour before presentation and are more likely to have obstetric intervention than those presenting in more advanced labour. Outcomes were similar whether or not the woman was initially allowed home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11762649     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.00265.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  25 in total

Review 1.  Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.

Authors:  Shinobu Kobayashi; Nobutsugu Hanada; Masayo Matsuzaki; Kenji Takehara; Erika Ota; Hatoko Sasaki; Chie Nagata; Rintaro Mori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-20

2.  Describing latent phase duration and associated characteristics among 1281 low-risk women in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Mia Ahlberg; Tekoa L King; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Jonathan M Snowden; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 3.  What is the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate among nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset?

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Thelma E Patrick; Lori A Cabbage; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

4.  Physiologic partograph to improve birth safety and outcomes among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Language Preference and Risk of Primary Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kimberly M Schaefer; Anna M Modest; Michele R Hacker; Lucy Chie; Yamicia Connor; Toni Golen; Rose L Molina
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-04-27

Review 6.  Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor.

Authors:  Miha Lucovnik; Ruben J Kuon; Linda R Chambliss; William L Maner; Shao-Qing Shi; Leili Shi; James Balducci; Robert E Garfield
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Jane M Lamp; Nancy K Lowe; Shannon L Gillespie; Loraine T Sinnott; Donna O McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Outcomes of nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset admitted to hospitals in preactive versus active labor.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Jane M Lamp; Jacalyn S Buck; Nancy K Lowe; Shannon L Gillespie; Sharon L Ryan
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Serum lactate dehydrogenase profile as a retrospective indicator of uterine preparedness for labor: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Effects of algorithm for diagnosis of active labour: cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Helen Cheyne; Vanora Hundley; Dawn Dowding; J Martin Bland; Paul McNamee; Ian Greer; Maggie Styles; Carol A Barnett; Graham Scotland; Catherine Niven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.