Literature DB >> 20628857

[Insurance costs in pancreatic surgery : does the pecuniary aspect indicate formation of centers?].

D Tittelbach-Helmrich1, L Abegg, U Wellner, F Makowiec, U T Hopt, T Keck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic resections in specialized centers are associated with low mortality, however, still with high morbidity. The complication rate can be reduced by long-term experience in high volume centers. In this study the influence of complications on costs in the German DRG system were analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data regarding operation time, hospital stay, complications and costs of 36 patients undergoing pancreatic head resection in the years 2005 and 2006 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. A p-value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Postoperative complications caused an increase in the duration of hospital stay from a median of 16 (range 11-38) to 33 (10-69) days. Costs, especially for ICU treatment and radiographic diagnostics, rose significantly. The average overall costs were 10,015 EUR (range 8,099-14,785 EUR) in patients without complications (n = 21) and 15,340 EUR (9,368-31,418 EUR) in patients with complications (n = 15). In contrast, according to the German DRG system 13,835 EUR (10,441-15,062 EUR) and 15,062 EUR (10,441-33,217 EUR) were refunded on average, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This case-cost calculation proves that pancreatic surgery in the context of the German DRG system can only be performed economically neutral in centers with low complications rates. The concentration of pancreatic surgery to centers with low complications rates, namely high volume centers, must be recommended from an economic point of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20628857     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-010-1953-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  18 in total

1.  Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors:  T A Gordon; H M Bowman; E B Bass; K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; R F Heitmiller; M A Choti; G P Burleyson; G Hsieh; J L Cameron
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Laparoscopic or open conventional cholecystectomy: clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  Florian Bosch; Ursula Wehrman; Hans-Detlef Saeger; Wilhelm Kirch
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

Review 4.  [Does hospital volume have influence on the results of pancreatic surgery?].

Authors:  T Keck; F Makowiec; U Adam; U T Hopt
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 0.942

5.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

6.  Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.

Authors:  D J Gouma; R C van Geenen; T M van Gulik; R J de Haan; L T de Wit; O R Busch; H Obertop
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Current practice patterns in pancreatic surgery: results of a multi-institutional analysis of seven large surgical departments in Germany with 1454 pancreatic head resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment study group).

Authors:  Frank Makowiec; Stefan Post; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Norbert Senninger; Heinz Becker; Michael Betzler; Heinz J Buhr; Ulrich T Hopt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt; M A Talamini; R H Hruban; S E Ord; P K Sauter; J Coleman; M L Zahurak; L B Grochow; R A Abrams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  J Rubén Rodríguez; Santos Soto Germes; Pari V Pandharipande; G Scott Gazelle; Sarah P Thayer; Andrew L Warshaw; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-04

10.  Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  Ulrich Adam; Frank Makowiec; Hartwig Riediger; Wolfgang D Schareck; Stefan Benz; Ulrich T Hopt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Minimum Volume Standards in Surgery - Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Hartwig Bauer; Kim C Honselmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  [Laparoscopic resection of the pancreatic head. Feasibility and perioperative results].

Authors:  T Keck; U Wellner; S Küsters; F Makowiec; O Sick; U T Hopt; K Karcz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Comparative analysis of the revenues of pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resections and laparoscopic cholecystectomies as prototypic surgical procedures in the German health-care system.

Authors:  Tina Stellwag; Christoph W Michalski; Bo Kong; Mert Erkan; Carolin Reiser-Erkan; Carsten Jäger; Christian Meinl; Helmut Friess; Jörg Kleeff
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Delayed gastric emptying following pancreatoduodenectomy with alimentary reconstruction according to Roux-en-Y or Billroth-II.

Authors:  Tim R Glowka; Markus Webler; Hanno Matthaei; Nico Schäfer; Volker Schmitz; Jörg C Kalff; Jens Standop; Steffen Manekeller
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.