Literature DB >> 12375608

Laparoscopic or open conventional cholecystectomy: clinical and economic considerations.

Florian Bosch, Ursula Wehrman, Hans-Detlef Saeger, Wilhelm Kirch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical aspects and financial costs of open conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of hospital records of patients who were operated on electively for symptomatic gallstone disease.
SETTING: University clinic, Germany.
SUBJECTS: 153 consecutive patients who had open conventional (1991-92) and 222 who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1993-96). A total of 251 cholecystectomies were done during 1991-92 and 523 cholecystectomies during 1993-96. INTERVENTION: Cholecystectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical aspects: operating time, complications, postoperative stay; financial aspects: total cost of hospital stay after cholecystectomy.
RESULTS: When open conventional was compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operating time was 66 and 92 minutes; complications, 9 and 6 cases; postoperative stay, 8 and 3 days; and total cost of hospital stay, US $ 3434 and US $ 2808 respectively.
CONCLUSION: The cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 18% less than for open conventional cholecystectomy, principally because of the shorter postoperative stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12375608     DOI: 10.1002/ejs.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  13 in total

1.  Operative stress response and energy metabolism after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Kai Luo; Jie-Shou Li; Ling-Tang Li; Kei-Hui Wang; Jing-Mei Shun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Profiling hospital performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on the administrative data of four teaching hospitals in Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirose; Yuichi Imanaka; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Miho Sekimoto; Yoshiaki Harada; Kazuaki Kuwabara; Kenshi Hayashida; Eun-Hwan Oh; S Edward Evans
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Richard Billingham; Ellen Farrokhi; Michael Florence; Daniel Herzig; Karen Horvath; Terry Rogers; Scott Steele; Rebecca Symons; Richard Thirlby; Mark Whiteford; David R Flum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  [Insurance costs in pancreatic surgery : does the pecuniary aspect indicate formation of centers?].

Authors:  D Tittelbach-Helmrich; L Abegg; U Wellner; F Makowiec; U T Hopt; T Keck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Intraoperative ERCP: What role does it have in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Luis R Rábago; Alejandro Ortega; Inmaculada Chico; David Collado; Ana Olivares; Jose Luis Castro; Elvira Quintanilla
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16

6.  [Twelve years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Authors:  B K Wölnerhanssen; C Ackermann; M O Guenin; B Kern; P Tondelli; M von Flüe; R Peterli
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  [Acute biliary colic. Etiology, diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  Birgit Terjung; M Neubrand; T Sauerbruch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  [Laparoscopy: potential and limitations in outpatient and short-term inpatient surgery].

Authors:  H Feussner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Patients' experiences and perceived causes of persisting discomfort following day surgery.

Authors:  Helena I Rosén; Ingrid He Bergh; Berit M Lundman; Lena B Mårtensson
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2010-10-27

10.  Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Abdulmohsen A Al-Mulhim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.