Literature DB >> 16618893

Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection.

J Rubén Rodríguez1, Santos Soto Germes, Pari V Pandharipande, G Scott Gazelle, Sarah P Thayer, Andrew L Warshaw, Carlos Fernández-del Castillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic stump leak (PL) after elective distal pancreatic resection significantly impacts cost and increases subsequent health care resource utilization. We sought to provide an economic framework for potential interventions aimed at reducing its occurrence.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series and economic evaluation.
SETTING: University-affiliated, tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: Sixty-six patients undergoing elective distal pancreatectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative complications; hospital and professional costs.
RESULTS: Overall postoperative morbidity occurred in 34 patients (52%) with no deaths. The total number of patients with complications directly related to PL was 22 (33%). The mean +/- SD number of total hospital days for the no-PL group was 5.2 +/- 1.7 days (range, 3-12 days) vs 16.6 +/- 14.6 days (range, 4-49 days) for the PL group (P = .001). The average patient with PL-related problems incurred a total cost that was 2.01 times greater than the average patient in the no-PL group. A decision analytic model developed to evaluate threshold costs showed that a hypothetical intervention designed to reduce the complication rate of distal pancreatectomy by one third would be financially justifiable up to a cost of $1418 per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications derived from PL following distal pancreatectomy double the cost and dramatically increase health care resource utilization. There is an urgent need to develop strategies that reduce the incidence of this common complication. Interventions aimed at decreasing the incidence of PL should take into account this cost differential. We provide an economic model to serve as a guide for developing these technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16618893      PMCID: PMC3998722          DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.141.4.361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  25 in total

1.  Does prophylactic octreotide benefit patients undergoing elective pancreatic resection?

Authors:  C J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Introduction to health economics for physicians.

Authors:  M I Meltzer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Mascetta; Roberto Salvia; Massimo Falconi; Andrew Gumbs; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Micheal G Sarr
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-05

6.  Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Bridget N Fahy; Charles F Frey; Hung S Ho; Laurel Beckett; Richard J Bold
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation?

Authors:  Maureen K Sheehan; Kimberly Beck; Steve Creech; Jack Pickleman; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Massimo Piccinini; Gilles Fourtanier; Jean-Marie Hay; Yves Flamant; Abe Fingerhut; Pierre-Louis Fagniez; Jacques Chipponi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03

9.  Octreotide does not prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula or mortality following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sean P Barnett; Pamela J Hodul; Steven Creech; Jack Pickleman; Gerard V Arahna
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation.

Authors:  M M Bilimoria; J N Cormier; Y Mun; J E Lee; D B Evans; P W T Pisters
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  41 in total

1.  Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource.

Authors:  Purvi Parikh; Mira Shiloach; Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  A one-stage operation for abdominal aortic aneurysm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: report of a case.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Tsuji; Ikurou Kitano; Katsuhiro Sawada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Application of polyethylene glycolic acid felt with fibrin sealant to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Toshiya Ochiai; Teruhisa Sonoyama; Koji Soga; Koji Inoue; Hisashi Ikoma; Atsushi Shiozaki; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Takeshi Kubota; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Shojiro Kikuchi; Daisuke Ichikawa; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Chouhei Sakakura; Kazuma Okamoto; Yukihito Kokuba; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Mesh reinforcement of pancreatic transection decreases incidence of pancreatic occlusion failure for left pancreatectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicholas A Hamilton; Matthew R Porembka; Fabian M Johnston; Feng Gao; Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Mark J Truty; Mark D Sawyer; Florencia G Que
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is as safe and feasible as open procedure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Xie; Yi-Ping Zhu; Xiao-Wu Xu; Ke Chen; Jia-Fei Yan; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Endoscopic access to and exploration of the lesser sac in a human cadaver model: opportunity for transgastric endoscopic pancreatic surgery (with video).

Authors:  B Joseph Elmunzer; Christopher J Sonnenday; Jason R Taylor; Joseph P Furlan; Steve J Schomisch; James M Scheiman; Amitabh Chak; Jeffrey M Marks; Jeffrey L Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  PolysorbR (an absorbable lactomer) staples, a safe closure technique for distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Gyula Farkas; László Leindler; János Márton; György Lázár; Gyula Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  [Distal pancreatectomy: radical or spleen-preserving?].

Authors:  A M Chromik; M Janot; D Sülberg; M H Seelig; W Uhl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Analysis of closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  U Lorenz; M Maier; U Steger; C Töpfer; A Thiede; S Timm
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.