Literature DB >> 20628787

An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481--The Home INR Study (THINRS).

Rowena J Dolor1, R Lynne Ruybalid, Lauren Uyeda, Robert G Edson, Ciaran Phibbs, Julia E Vertrees, Mei-Chiung Shih, Alan K Jacobson, David B Matchar.   

Abstract

Prior studies suggest patient self-testing (PST) of prothrombin time (PT) can improve the quality of anticoagulation (AC) and reduce complications (e.g., bleeding and thromboembolic events). "The Home INR Study" (THINRS) compared AC management with frequent PST using a home monitoring device to high-quality AC management (HQACM) with clinic-based monitoring on major health outcomes. A key clinical and policy question is whether and which patients can successfully use such devices. We report the results of Part 1 of THINRS in which patients and caregivers were evaluated for their ability to perform PST. Study-eligible patients (n = 3643) were trained to use the home monitoring device and evaluated after 2-4 weeks for PST competency. Information about demographics, medical history, warfarin use, medications, plus measures of numeracy, literacy, cognition, dexterity, and satisfaction with AC were collected. Approximately 80% (2931 of 3643) of patients trained on PST demonstrated competency; of these, 8% (238) required caregiver assistance. Testers who were not competent to perform PST had higher numbers of practice attempts, higher cuvette wastage, and were less able to perform a fingerstick or obtain blood for the cuvette in a timely fashion. Factors associated with failure to pass PST training included increased age, previous stroke history, poor cognition, and poor manual dexterity. A majority of patients were able to perform PST. Successful home monitoring of PT with a PST device required adequate levels of cognition and manual dexterity. Training a caregiver modestly increased the proportion of patients who can perform PST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20628787     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-010-0499-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  34 in total

1.  Self-management versus conventional management of oral anticoagulant therapy: A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Christensen; Marianne Maegaard; Henrik T Sørensen; Vibeke E Hjortdal; J Michael Hasenkam
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.487

2.  Patient self-management of anticoagulation therapy: a trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Sue Jowett; Stirling Bryan; Ellen Murray; Deborah McCahon; James Raftery; F D Richard Hobbs; David Fitzmaurice
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Patient self-testing is a reliable and acceptable alternative to laboratory INR monitoring.

Authors:  Chris Gardiner; Karen Williams; Ian J Mackie; Samuel J Machin; Hannah Cohen
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Oral anticoagulation self-management and management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic: a randomised cross-over comparison.

Authors:  M E Cromheecke; M Levi; L P Colly; B J de Mol; M H Prins; B A Hutten; R Mak; K C Keyzers; H R Büller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A randomised control trial of patient self-management of oral anticoagulation compared with patient self-testing.

Authors:  Chris Gardiner; Karen Williams; Ian Longair; Ian J Mackie; Samuel J Machin; Hannah Cohen
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Comparison of INR stability between self-monitoring and standard laboratory method: preliminary results of a prospective study in 67 mechanical heart valve patients.

Authors:  Claire Dauphin; Benoît Legault; Patricia Jaffeux; Pascal Motreff; Kasra Azarnoush; Hélène Joly; Etienne Geoffroy; Bruno Aublet-Cuvelier; Lionel Camilleri; Jean-René Lusson; Jean Cassagnes; Charles de Riberolles
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.340

7.  Comparison of the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy through patient self-management and management by specialized anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A P A Gadisseur; W G M Breukink-Engbers; F J M van der Meer; A M H van den Besselaar; A Sturk; F R Rosendaal
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-24

8.  The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills.

Authors:  R M Parker; D W Baker; M V Williams; J R Nurss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  ABILHAND: a Rasch-built measure of manual ability.

Authors:  M Penta; J L Thonnard; L Tesio
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Self- versus conventional management of oral anticoagulant therapy: effects on INR variability and coumarin dose in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Decker Christensen; Marianne Maegaard; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Vibeke Elisabeth Hjortdal; J Michael Hasenkam
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.571

View more
  8 in total

1.  At-Home Versus In-Clinic INR Monitoring: A Cost-Utility Analysis from The Home INR Study (THINRS).

Authors:  Ciaran S Phibbs; Sean R Love; Alan K Jacobson; Robert Edson; Pon Su; Lauren Uyeda; David B Matchar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Danielle E Clarkesmith; Helen M Pattison; Phyo H Khaing; Deirdre A Lane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-05

3.  Home management of INR in the public health system: feasibility of self-management of oral anticoagulation and long-term performance of individual POC devices in determining INR.

Authors:  Sabrina da Silva Saraiva; Fernanda Andrade Orsi; Marcos Pereira Santos; Tania Machado; Silmara Montalvão; Carolina Costa-Lima; Erich Vinícius de Paula; Marina Pereira Colella; Joyce Annichino-Bizzacchi
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Education and practice gaps on atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation: a survey of cardiovascular nurses.

Authors:  Caleb Ferguson; Sally C Inglis; Phillip J Newton; Sandy Middleton; Peter S Macdonald; Patricia M Davidson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Factors determining patients' intentions to use point-of-care testing medical devices for self-monitoring: the case of international normalized ratio self-testing.

Authors:  Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah; Julie Barnett; Jasna Kuljis; Kate Hone; Richard Kaczmarski
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 6.  Atrial fibrillation and thromboprophylaxis in heart failure: the need for patient-centered approaches to address adherence.

Authors:  Caleb Ferguson; Sally C Inglis; Phillip J Newton; Sandy Middleton; Peter S Macdonald; Patricia M Davidson
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-01-16

7.  Telephone-based anticoagulation management in the homebound setting: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Samer Hassan; Ali Naboush; Jared Radbel; Razan Asaad; Homam Alkaied; Seleshi Demissie; Terenig Terjanian
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2013-12-03

Review 8.  Relation between health literacy, self-care and adherence to treatment with oral anticoagulants in adults: a narrative systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Cabellos-García; Antonio Martínez-Sabater; Enrique Castro-Sánchez; Mari Kangasniemi; Raul Juárez-Vela; Vicente Gea-Caballero
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.