Literature DB >> 14638565

Comparison of the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy through patient self-management and management by specialized anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands: a randomized clinical trial.

A P A Gadisseur1, W G M Breukink-Engbers, F J M van der Meer, A M H van den Besselaar, A Sturk, F R Rosendaal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that patient self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) can improve treatment quality. However, most of these studies were not conducted within a specialized anticoagulation care system. The objective of the present study was to determine whether patient self-management of OAT improves the quality of care delivered by anticoagulation clinics.
METHODS: In this randomized study by 2 Dutch anticoagulation clinics 341 patients aged between 18 and 75 years and receiving long-term OAT were divided into 4 groups: an existing routine care group of patients untrained in self-management; a routine care group of trained patients; a group managed weekly at an anticoagulation clinic where international normalized ratios were measured by trained patients; and weekly patient self-management. A 2-step randomization procedure was followed: first, a Zelen-design randomization was performed to distribute patients (without informing them) to the existing care group or to receive training in self-management; second, trained patients were randomized to the 3 other study groups.
RESULTS: Only 25.6% of invited patients agreed to participate in the training program. Patients who remained in the existing care group were within the international normalized ratio target range 63.5% of the time. The type of coumarin taken was a major predicting factor of OAT quality. In all study groups phenprocoumon outperformed acenocoumarol by 11.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6%-16.5%). Weekly management with phenprocoumon led to a 6.5% improvement (95% CI, 0.0%-13.1%) in time in the international normalized ratio target range when patients were managed at an anticoagulation clinic and to an 8.7% improvement (95% CI, 1.6%-15.9%) when patients were self-managed. Weekly management with acenocoumarol did not improve the quality of OAT.
CONCLUSION: With selected patients, the quality of OAT obtained through patient self-management is at least as high as that delivered by specialized physicians at anticoagulation clinics. Weekly management of OAT with long-acting phenprocoumon has to be preferred at anticoagulation clinics or, where possible, through patient self-management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14638565     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.21.2639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  27 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of supplemental education in patients treated with oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Miney Paquette; Daniel M Witt; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Jack Ansell; Holger J Schünemann; Wojtek Wiercioch; Robby Nieuwlaat
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-05-28

Review 2.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  [New oral anticoagulants: who really needs them?].

Authors:  H K Berthold
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of patient self-testing therapy of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Sutat Kantito; Surasak Saokaew; Sukit Yamwong; Prin Vathesatogkit; Wisuit Katekao; Piyamitr Sritara; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481--The Home INR Study (THINRS).

Authors:  Rowena J Dolor; R Lynne Ruybalid; Lauren Uyeda; Robert G Edson; Ciaran Phibbs; Julia E Vertrees; Mei-Chiung Shih; Alan K Jacobson; David B Matchar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

7.  EDUC'AVK: reduction of oral anticoagulant-related adverse events after patient education: a prospective multicenter open randomized study.

Authors:  Gilles Pernod; José Labarère; Jacqueline Yver; Bernadette Satger; Benoit Allenet; Touffek Berremili; Michèle Fontaine; Guy Franco; Jean Luc Bosson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Quality of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients who perform self management: warfarin versus phenprocoumon.

Authors:  Christina Friis Jensen; Thomas Decker Christensen; Marianne Maegaard; John Michael Hasenkam
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Warfarin therapy: in need of improvement after all these years.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.889

10.  Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: does it work outside trial conditions?

Authors:  C Gardiner; I Longair; M A Pescott; H Erwin; J Hills; S J Machin; H Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.