Literature DB >> 15638860

Patient self-testing is a reliable and acceptable alternative to laboratory INR monitoring.

Chris Gardiner1, Karen Williams, Ian J Mackie, Samuel J Machin, Hannah Cohen.   

Abstract

SAn ageing population and the continuing expansion of clinical indications for coumadin therapy have increased pressure on hospital anticoagulant clinics. One solution is patient self-testing (PST) of the international normalized ratio (INR) using capillary blood samples on point-of-care coagulation monitors at home. We conducted a prospective study to determine whether patients can achieve accurate INR values through PST, using the CoaguChek S (Roche Diagnostics, Lewes, UK). The main outcome measurements were: comparability of INR values obtained by PST and the hospital laboratory, patient acceptability as assessed by a questionnaire and anticoagulant control. Eighty-four patients [53 men, 31 women; median age 59 years (range 26-83)], receiving long-term oral anticoagulation (warfarin), were recruited from our Anticoagulation Clinic. Patients were randomized to weekly self-testing or continuing 4-weekly hospital laboratory monitoring of INR. Comparison of INRs (n = 234) showed no significant differences between the CoaguChek (median INR 3.02) and laboratory testing (median INR 3.07). There was excellent correlation between the two methods (r = 0.95), with 85% of CoaguChek results within 0.5 INR units of the laboratory method. On four occasions, differences of >1 unit INR were obtained, but in each case the patient's anticoagulation was unstable (INR >4.5 by both methods) and the differences in INR would not have altered patient management. 87% of patients found self-testing straightforward, 87% were confident in the result they obtained and 77% preferred self-testing. We conclude that PST is a reliable alternative to hospital clinic attendance and is acceptable to the majority of suitably trained patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15638860     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05300.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  23 in total

1.  On-chip titration of an anticoagulant argatroban and determination of the clotting time within whole blood or plasma using a plug-based microfluidic system.

Authors:  Helen Song; Hung-Wing Li; Matthew S Munson; Thuong G Van Ha; Rustem F Ismagilov
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of patient self-testing therapy of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Sutat Kantito; Surasak Saokaew; Sukit Yamwong; Prin Vathesatogkit; Wisuit Katekao; Piyamitr Sritara; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481--The Home INR Study (THINRS).

Authors:  Rowena J Dolor; R Lynne Ruybalid; Lauren Uyeda; Robert G Edson; Ciaran Phibbs; Julia E Vertrees; Mei-Chiung Shih; Alan K Jacobson; David B Matchar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Characteristics of ambulatory anticoagulant adverse drug events: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Andrea L Long; Lisa Bendz; Monica M Horvath; Heidi Cozart; Julie Eckstrand; Julie Whitehurst; Jeffrey Ferranti
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2010-02-18

5.  What are the basic self-monitoring components for cardiovascular risk management?

Authors:  Alison M Ward; Carl Heneghan; Rafael Perera; Dan Lasserson; David Nunan; David Mant; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 6.  Clinical Question: In adult patients on warfarin, does-home-self-testing of prothrombin time and/or international normalized ratio provide the same outcomes compared to testing by a home health nurse or in a clinical setting?

Authors:  May Kou Heu; Toney Welborn; Zsolt Nagykaldi
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2016-03

Review 7.  Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Carl J Heneghan; Josep M Garcia-Alamino; Elizabeth A Spencer; Alison M Ward; Rafael Perera; Clare Bankhead; Pablo Alonso-Coello; David Fitzmaurice; Kamal R Mahtani; Igho J Onakpoya
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-05

Review 8.  Self-management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Andrea Siebenhofer; Klaus Jeitler; Karl Horvath; Wolfgang Habacher; Louise Schmidt; Thomas Semlitsch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Potentially avoidable inpatient nights among warfarin receiving patients; an audit of a single university teaching hospital.

Authors:  Dónall Forde; Mortimer B O'Connor; Oonagh Gilligan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-03-13

10.  Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: does it work outside trial conditions?

Authors:  C Gardiner; I Longair; M A Pescott; H Erwin; J Hills; S J Machin; H Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.