Literature DB >> 17610346

Self- versus conventional management of oral anticoagulant therapy: effects on INR variability and coumarin dose in a randomized controlled trial.

Thomas Decker Christensen1, Marianne Maegaard, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Vibeke Elisabeth Hjortdal, J Michael Hasenkam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparison of self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy versus conventional management has been hindered by use of different methods. We tested the hypothesis that there is no difference in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) variability, INR level, and coumarin dose among patients randomized to conventional management versus self-management.
METHODS: The study design included uniform analysis of blinded control blood samples in both treatment arms. Ninety-two patients were randomly assigned to either self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy (including a teaching program for self-management followed by 6 months of independent self-management) or 6 months of conventional management. The endpoints were the variance (median square of the standard deviation) of the INR value, the median INR-value (using a blinded control sample analyzed monthly by a reference laboratory), and the coumarin dose.
RESULTS: Self-management was associated with a statistically significant smaller variance in INR values, a higher median INR value, and a higher dose of warfarin compared with conventional management. No difference was found in the group of patients using phenprocoumon.
CONCLUSION: Training and implementation of patient self-management leads to a smaller variance in INR values, a higher median INR value and a higher dose of coumarin compared with results obtained for conventionally managed patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17610346     DOI: 10.2165/00129784-200707030-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs        ISSN: 1175-3277            Impact factor:   3.571


  5 in total

1.  An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481--The Home INR Study (THINRS).

Authors:  Rowena J Dolor; R Lynne Ruybalid; Lauren Uyeda; Robert G Edson; Ciaran Phibbs; Julia E Vertrees; Mei-Chiung Shih; Alan K Jacobson; David B Matchar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Point-of-care INR coagulometers for self-management of oral anticoagulation: primary care diagnostic technology update.

Authors:  Annette Plüddemann; Matthew Thompson; Jane Wolstenholme; Christopher P Price; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Danielle E Clarkesmith; Helen M Pattison; Phyo H Khaing; Deirdre A Lane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-05

4.  Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio (INR) Monitoring Devices for Patients on Long-term Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

5.  Coumarin Content, Morphological Variation, and Molecular Phylogenetics of Melilotus.

Authors:  Jiyu Zhang; Hongyan Di; Kai Luo; Zulfi Jahufer; Fan Wu; Zhen Duan; Alan Stewart; Zhuanzhuan Yan; Yanrong Wang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.