Literature DB >> 20625471

A precedence effect underlies preferences for calls with leading pulses in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor.

Vincent T Marshall1, H Carl Gerhardt.   

Abstract

The temporal relationship between signals often has strong and repeatable influences on receiver behaviour. While several studies have shown that receivers prefer temporally leading signals, we show that the relative timing of signal elements within overlapping signals can also have repeatable influences on receiver responses. Female grey treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, preferred overlapping conspecific advertisement call alternatives in which pulses were in the leading position relative to pulses in an alternative. The preference was maintained even when the first pulse of the stimulus with leading pulses began after that of the call with following pulses. To rule out the possibility of masking interference of the pulse pattern, we used a split-pulse design in which the playback of two nonoverlapping pulse elements were synchronized from spatially separated speakers. Females were attracted to the source of the short (6 ms) leading pulse element, which did not attract females in isolation even though its amplitude was 24 dB lower than the long (24 ms) following element, which did attract females in isolation. Taken together, our results fall within a range of phenomena that have been classified as precedence effects. However, to our knowledge, showing localization based on successive leading pulses rather than the very first-arriving pulse is a novel discovery for nonhuman animals.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20625471      PMCID: PMC2898283          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  16 in total

1.  A quantitative analysis of behavioral selectivity for pulse rise-time in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor.

Authors:  H C Gerhardt; J Schul
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The precedence effect.

Authors:  R Y Litovsky; H S Colburn; W A Yost; S J Guzman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contralateral inhibition as a sensory bias: the neural basis for a female preference in a synchronously calling bushcricket, Mecopoda elongata.

Authors:  Heiner Römer; Berthold Hedwig; Swidbert R Ott
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs.

Authors:  Johannes Schul; Sarah L Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Localization and the law of the first wavefront in the median plane.

Authors:  J Blauert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Selective phonotaxis to advertisement calls in the grey treefrog Hyla versicolor: behavioral experiments and neurophysiological correlates.

Authors:  B Diekamp; H C Gerhardt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Localization of paired sound sources in cats: effects of variable arrival times.

Authors:  J L Cranford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The precedence effect in three species of birds (Melopsittacus undulatus, Serinus canaria, and Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  Micheal L Dent; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Advertisement-call modification, male competition and female preference in the bird-voiced treefrog Hyla avivoca.

Authors:  Carlos César Martínez-Rivera; H Carl Gerhardt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Kasen K Riemersma
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  8 in total

1.  Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 2.  Signal interactions and interference in insect choruses: singing and listening in the social environment.

Authors:  Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The dual benefits of synchronized mating signals in a Japanese treefrog: attracting mates and manipulating predators.

Authors:  Henry D Legett; Ikkyu Aihara; X E Bernal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Neuronal correlates of a preference for leading signals in the synchronizing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; R Hashim; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Competition and cooperation in a synchronous bushcricket chorus.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; L Haitzinger; M Kainz; H Römer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 6.  From microseconds to seconds and minutes-time computation in insect hearing.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Heiner Römer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Rhythm Generation and Rhythm Perception in Insects: The Evolution of Synchronous Choruses.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Heiner Römer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Animal choruses emerge from receiver psychology.

Authors:  Michael D Greenfield; Yareli Esquer-Garrigos; Réjane Streiff; Virginie Party
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.