Literature DB >> 25236356

Signal interactions and interference in insect choruses: singing and listening in the social environment.

Michael D Greenfield1.   

Abstract

Acoustic insects usually sing amidst conspecifics, thereby creating a social environment-the chorus-in which individuals communicate, find mates, and avoid predation. A temporal structure may arise in a chorus because of competitive and cooperative factors that favor certain signal interactions between neighbors. This temporal structure can generate significant acoustic interference among singers that pose problems for communication, mate finding, and predator detection. Acoustic insects can reduce interference by means of selective attention to only their nearest neighbors and by alternating calls with neighbors. Alternatively, they may synchronize, allowing them to preserve call rhythm and also to listen for predators during the silent intervals between calls. Moreover, males singing in choruses may benefit from reduced per capita predation risk as well as enhanced vigilance. They may also enjoy greater per capita attractiveness to females, particularly in the case of synchronous choruses. In many cases, however, the overall temporal structure of the chorus is only an emergent property of simple, pairwise interactions between neighbors. Nonetheless, the chorus that emerges can impose significant selection pressure on the singing of those individual males. Thus, feedback loops may occur and potentially influence traits at both individual and group levels in a chorus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25236356     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0938-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  37 in total

1.  Contralateral inhibition as a sensory bias: the neural basis for a female preference in a synchronously calling bushcricket, Mecopoda elongata.

Authors:  Heiner Römer; Berthold Hedwig; Swidbert R Ott
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  Causes and consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Keeping up appearances: male fiddler crabs wave faster in a crowd.

Authors:  Richard N C Milner; Michael D Jennions; Patricia R Y Backwell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Firefly synchrony: a behavioral strategy to minimize visual clutter.

Authors:  Andrew Moiseff; Jonathan Copeland
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Selective attention in a synchronising bushcricket: physiology, behaviour and ecology.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Jürgen Stradner; Rohini Balakrishnan; Heinrich Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Acoustic synchrony: two mechanisms in the snowy tree cricket.

Authors:  T J Walker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Is more choice always desirable? Evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment.

Authors:  John M C Hutchinson
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-02

8.  Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron.

Authors:  G S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Synchrony during acoustic interactions in the bushcricket Mecopoda 'Chirper' (Tettigoniidae:Orthoptera) is generated by a combination of chirp-by-chirp resetting and change in intrinsic chirp rate.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Rohini Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Calling dynamics and call synchronization in a local group of unison bout callers.

Authors:  Douglas L Jones; Russell L Jones; Rama Ratnam
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  15 in total

1.  Insect hearing: from physics to ecology.

Authors:  Bernhard Ronacher; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  High channel count microphone array accurately and precisely localizes ultrasonic signals from freely-moving mice.

Authors:  Megan R Warren; Daniel T Sangiamo; Joshua P Neunuebel
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 3.  Rhythm interaction in animal groups: selective attention in communication networks.

Authors:  Michael D Greenfield; Ikkyu Aihara; Guy Amichay; Marianna Anichini; Vivek Nityananda
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Keeping up with the neighbor: a novel mechanism of call synchrony in Neoconocephalus ensiger katydids.

Authors:  Megan A Murphy; Nathan L Thompson; Johannes Schul
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Rhythm Generation and Rhythm Perception in Insects: The Evolution of Synchronous Choruses.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Heiner Römer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Sex-specific responses to territorial intrusions in a communication network: Evidence from radio-tagged great tits.

Authors:  Lysanne Snijders; Kees van Oers; Marc Naguib
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Synchronous waving in fiddler crabs: a review.

Authors:  Patricia Ruth Yvonne Backwell
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 8.  Innate releasing mechanisms and fixed action patterns: basic ethological concepts as drivers for neuroethological studies on acoustic communication in Orthoptera.

Authors:  Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Animal choruses emerge from receiver psychology.

Authors:  Michael D Greenfield; Yareli Esquer-Garrigos; Réjane Streiff; Virginie Party
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  25 Years of sensory drive: the evidence and its watery bias.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings; John A Endler
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.