Literature DB >> 20623171

Does high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation produce residual and/or cumulative effects within an experimental session?

Massihullah Hamidi1, Jeffrey S Johson, Eva Feredoes, Bradley R Postle.   

Abstract

A common procedure for studying the effects on cognition of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is to deliver rTMS concurrent with task performance, and to compare task performance on these trials versus on trials without rTMS. Recent evidence that TMS can have effects on neural activity that persist longer than the experimental session itself, however, raise questions about the assumption of the transient nature of rTMS that underlies many concurrent (or "online") rTMS designs. To our knowledge, there have been no studies in the cognitive domain examining whether the application of brief trains of rTMS during specific epochs of a complex task may have effects that spill over into subsequent task epochs, and perhaps into subsequent trials. We looked for possible immediate spill-over and longer-term cumulative effects of rTMS in data from two studies of visual short-term delayed recognition. In 54 subjects, 10-Hz rTMS trains were applied to five different brain regions during the 3-s delay period of a spatial task, and in a second group of 15 subjects, electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded while 10-Hz rTMS was applied to two brain areas during the 3-s delay period of both spatial and object tasks. No evidence for immediate effects was found in the comparison of the memory probe-evoked response on trials that were vs. were not preceded by delay-period rTMS. No evidence for cumulative effects was found in analyses of behavioral performance, and of EEG signal, as a function of task block. The implications of these findings, and their relation to the broader literature on acute vs. long-lasting effects of rTMS, are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20623171      PMCID: PMC2978750          DOI: 10.1007/s10548-010-0153-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  33 in total

1.  Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex.

Authors:  Jose Rafael Romero; David Anschel; Roland Sparing; Massimo Gangitano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex.

Authors:  W Gerschlager; H R Siebner; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Ipsi- and contralateral EEG reactions to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Soile Komssi; Hannu J Aronen; Juha Huttunen; Martti Kesäniemi; Lauri Soinne; Vadim V Nikouline; Marko Ollikainen; Risto O Roine; Jari Karhu; Sauli Savolainen; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Studies in cognition: the problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  E M Robertson; H Théoret; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Facilitation of performance in a working memory task with rTMS stimulation of the precuneus: frequency- and time-dependent effects.

Authors:  B Luber; L H Kinnunen; B C Rakitin; R Ellsasser; Y Stern; S H Lisanby
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Modulation of cortical oscillatory activity during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Debora Brignani; Paolo Manganotti; Paolo M Rossini; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The neural bases of the short-term storage of verbal information are anatomically variable across individuals.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Giulio Tononi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

10.  State-dependent variability of neuronal responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Elena A Allen; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  9 in total

1.  Human cortical theta reactivity to high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Nor Azila Noh; Giorgio Fuggetta
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Electrophysiological correlates of stimulus-driven reorienting deficits after interference with right parietal cortex during a spatial attention task: a TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Paolo Capotosto; Maurizio Corbetta; Gian Luca Romani; Claudio Babiloni
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Distinct contributions by frontal and parietal cortices support working memory.

Authors:  Wayne E Mackey; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Role of Single Low Pulse Intensity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Frontal Cortex for Cognitive Function.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Fawaz Al-Hussain; Ali Hamza; Ghadah Faisal Shareefi; Turki Abualait; Woo-Kyoung Yoo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Combining HF rTMS over the Left DLPFC with Concurrent Cognitive Activity for the Offline Modulation of Working Memory in Healthy Volunteers: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Ilya Bakulin; Alfiia Zabirova; Dmitry Lagoda; Alexandra Poydasheva; Anastasiia Cherkasova; Nikolay Pavlov; Peter Kopnin; Dmitry Sinitsyn; Elena Kremneva; Maxim Fedorov; Elena Gnedovskaya; Natalia Suponeva; Michael Piradov
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-02-04

7.  Network-based rTMS to modulate working memory: The difficult choice of effective parameters for online interventions.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Moritz Dannhauer; Hannah Palmer; Susan A Hilbig; Courtney A Crowell; Joyce E-H Wang; Andrew M Michael; Eleanor A Wood; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev; Roberto Cabeza; Simon W Davis; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  rTMS of the superior parietal lobule improves contrast discrimination but has no effect on the perception of distance between stimuli in the image plane.

Authors:  Nicolo Biagi; Charlotte Goodwin; David T Field
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 1.695

9.  Long-range neural activity evoked by premotor cortex stimulation: a TMS/EEG co-registration study.

Authors:  Marco Zanon; Piero P Battaglini; Joanna Jarmolowska; Gilberto Pizzolato; Pierpaolo Busan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.