Literature DB >> 22905824

Electrophysiological correlates of stimulus-driven reorienting deficits after interference with right parietal cortex during a spatial attention task: a TMS-EEG study.

Paolo Capotosto1, Maurizio Corbetta, Gian Luca Romani, Claudio Babiloni.   

Abstract

TMS interference over right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) causally disrupts behaviorally and EEG rhythmic correlates of endogenous spatial orienting before visual target presentation [Capotosto, P., Babiloni, C., Romani, G. L., & Corbetta, M. Differential contribution of right and left parietal cortex to the control of spatial attention: A simultaneous EEG-rTMS study. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 446-454, 2012; Capotosto, P., Babiloni, C., Romani, G. L., & Corbetta, M. Fronto-parietal cortex controls spatial attention through modulation of anticipatory alpha rhythms. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5863-5872, 2009]. Here we combine data from our previous studies to examine whether right parietal TMS during spatial orienting also impairs stimulus-driven reorienting or the ability to efficiently process unattended stimuli, that is, stimuli outside the current focus of attention. Healthy volunteers (n = 24) performed a Posner spatial cueing task while their EEG activity was being monitored. Repetitive TMS (rTMS) was applied for 150 msec simultaneously to the presentation of a central arrow directing spatial attention to the location of an upcoming visual target. Right IPS-rTMS impaired target detection, especially for stimuli presented at unattended locations; it also caused a modulation of the amplitude of parieto-occipital positive ERPs peaking at about 480 msec (P3) post-target. The P3 significantly decreased for unattended targets and significantly increased for attended targets after right IPS-rTMS as compared with sham stimulation. Similar effects were obtained for left IPS stimulation albeit in a smaller group of volunteers. We conclude that disruption of anticipatory processes in right IPS has prolonged effects that persist during target processing. The P3 decrement may reflect interference with postdecision processes that are part of stimulus-driven reorienting. Right IPS is a node of functional interaction between endogenous spatial orienting and stimulus-driven reorienting processes in human vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22905824      PMCID: PMC3879779          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  39 in total

1.  Tolerability and safety of high daily doses of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy young men.

Authors:  Berry Anderson; Alexander Mishory; Ziad Nahas; Jeffrey J Borckardt; Kaori Yamanaka; Komal Rastogi; Mark S George
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.635

Review 2.  Network reset: a simplified overarching theory of locus coeruleus noradrenaline function.

Authors:  Sebastien Bouret; Susan J Sara
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  fMRI in an oddball task: effects of target-to-target interval.

Authors:  Michael C Stevens; Vince D Calhoun; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Posterior alpha activity is not phase-reset by visual stimuli.

Authors:  Ali Mazaheri; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of right parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation on object identification and orientation judgments.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Claire T Benito; Manuela Ruzzoli; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gaurav Patel; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Safety of rTMS to non-motor cortical areas in healthy participants and patients.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Machii; Daniel Cohen; Ciro Ramos-Estebanez; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Laura L Colgin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Bruce Luber; Courtney A Crowell; Susan A Hilbig; Wesley Lim; Duy Nguyen; Nicolas A Chrapliwy; Simon W Davis; Roberto Cabeza; Sarah H Lisanby; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Hemispheric Asymmetry of Globus Pallidus Relates to Alpha Modulation in Reward-Related Attentional Tasks.

Authors:  Cecilia Mazzetti; Tobias Staudigl; Tom R Marshall; Johanna M Zumer; Sean J Fallon; Ole Jensen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Network-targeted cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation improves attentional control.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Michelle Thai; Hidefusa Okabe; Joseph DeGutis; Elyana Saad; Simon E Laganiere; Mark A Halko
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Integrating when and what information in the left parietal lobe allows language rule generalization.

Authors:  Joan Orpella; Pablo Ripollés; Manuela Ruzzoli; Julià L Amengual; Alicia Callejas; Anna Martinez-Alvarez; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Ruth de Diego-Balaguer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Resting-state modulation of α rhythms by interference with angular gyrus activity.

Authors:  Paolo Capotosto; Claudio Babiloni; Gian Luca Romani; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Characterizing and Modulating Brain Circuitry through Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Faranak Farzan; Marine Vernet; Mouhsin M D Shafi; Alexander Rotenberg; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  1-Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex Modulates Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Guang-Qing Xu; Yue Lan; Qun Zhang; Dong-Xu Liu; Xiao-Fei He; Tuo Lin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Offline stimulation of human parietal cortex differently affects resting EEG microstates.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Croce; Filippo Zappasodi; Paolo Capotosto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Temporal dynamics of TMS interference over preparatory alpha activity during semantic decisions.

Authors:  Sara Spadone; Carlo Sestieri; Antonello Baldassarre; Paolo Capotosto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  No Differential Effects of Two Different Alpha-Band Electrical Stimulation Protocols Over Fronto-Parietal Regions on Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Martine R van Schouwenburg; Lynn K A Sörensen; Raza de Klerk; Leon C Reteig; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.