Literature DB >> 20620833

Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants.

Cheol-Hyun Moon1, Hyun-Kyung Park, Ji-Seon Nam, Jeong-Soo Im, Seung-Hak Baek.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this research was to determine which clinical and skeletal factors are related to the success rate of orthodontic mini-implants in the maxillary and mandibular posterior buccal areas.
METHODS: A total of 778 orthodontic mini-implants (Dual-Top Anchor System, Jeil Medical, Seoul, Korea; 1.6 mm diameter, 8 mm length, cylinder shape, self-drilling type) in 306 patients were retrospectively examined. The success rate was calculated according to clinical variables (sex, age, soft-tissue management, placement position, sagittal skeletal classification, arch-length discrepancy, and side) and skeletal variables (articular angle, mandibular plane to palatal plane angle, Frankfort-mandibular plane angle, mandibular plane angle, gonial angle, upper gonial angle, and lower gonial angle). Analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-square tests, and multiple logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The overall success rate was 79.0%. Almost 80% of the failures occurred within the first 4 months. The clinical variables sex, age, soft-tissue management, sagittal skeletal classification, arch-length discrepancy, and side did not show significant differences in the success rate. Although the success rates were significantly different according to placement position (P <0.01), there was no significant difference in the odds ratios among placement positions. In the skeletal variables, average upper gonial angle (84.2%) had a significantly higher success rate than low (75.7%) and high (71.2%) upper gonial angles (P <0.01). High Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (P <0.05) and low upper gonial angle groups (P <0.05) showed significant lower odds ratios than did the other types.
CONCLUSIONS: Vertical skeletal pattern might be an important factor for the success of orthodontic mini-implants placed in posterior buccal areas. Copyright (c) 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20620833     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Ilknur Veli; Tancan Uysal; Asli Baysal; Irfan Karadede
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness and Its Relationship with Palatal Vault Depth for Mini-Implant Insertion Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images.

Authors:  Gholinia Faegheh; Negar Khosravifard; Dina Maleki; Sahar Khaje Hosseini
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

3.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the deformation of the human mandible: a preliminary study from the perspective of orthodontic mini-implant stability.

Authors:  Sun-Hye Baek; Hyun-Suk Cha; Jung-Yul Cha; Yoon-Shik Moon; Sang-Jin Sung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Failure rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region.

Authors:  Flavio Uribe; Rana Mehr; Ajay Mathur; Nandakumar Janakiraman; Veerasathpurush Allareddy
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  Relationship Between the Thickness of Cortical Bone at Maxillary Mid-palatal Area and Facial Height Using CBCT.

Authors:  Masume Johari; Farzaneh Kaviani; Arman Saeedi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-07-31

6.  The short-term skeleto-dental effects of a new spring for the intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth in open bite patients.

Authors:  Riaan Foot; Oyku Dalci; Carmen Gonzales; Nour Eldin Tarraf; M Ali Darendeliler
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness for the placement of orthodontic miniscrews in adults with different facial types.

Authors:  Yunji Wang; Ye Qiu; Henglang Liu; Jinlong He; Xiaoping Fan
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Influence of interradicular and palatal placement of orthodontic mini-implants on the success (survival) rate.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Dirk Bister; Georgios Kanavakis; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Quantitative evaluation of alveolar cortical bone density in adults with different vertical facial types using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Fulya Ozdemir; Murat Tozlu; Derya Germec Cakan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness in patients with normal and open vertical skeletal configurations using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Piyoros Suteerapongpun; Tanapan Wattanachai; Apirum Janhom; Polbhat Tripuwabhrut; Dhirawat Jotikasthira
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.