Literature DB >> 35788436

Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness and Its Relationship with Palatal Vault Depth for Mini-Implant Insertion Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images.

Gholinia Faegheh1, Negar Khosravifard2, Dina Maleki3, Sahar Khaje Hosseini1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure the thickness of the palatal bone using cone beam computed tomography images for placement of mini-screws and their relationship with palatal vault depth.
METHODS: This study was performed on 150 maxillary cone beam computed tomography images, 50% (n = 75) had deep palate and 50% (n = 75) had normal palate and 27.3% (n = 41) were male and 72.7% (n =109) were female. Coronal sections with a thickness of 1 mm were prepared at distances of 4 mm, 8 mm, 12 mm, 16 mm, 20 mm, and 24 mm from the posterior wall of the incisive foramen. Then, in each section, in the midsagittal line and at distances of 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, and 10 mm from that to the lateral sides, the bone thickness was measured. The Korkhaus index was used to identify the patients with a high palatal vault.
RESULTS: The results showed that at the posterior sections in the midsagittal and parasagittal area, a significant difference (P < .05) was observed between deep and normal palate, and in these points, the bone thickness in the normal palate was greater. Also, in the section of 4 mm and 8 mm, a significant difference was observed between males and females in most of these points, and those were greater in males than females.
CONCLUSION: The maximum thickness of the palatal bone was observed first along the midsagittal line and then the paramedian and in the anterior section. Patients with deep palate had less palatal bone thickness in the posterior sections.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35788436      PMCID: PMC9316261          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.20145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  16 in total

1.  Anatomic landmarks and availability of bone for placement of orthodontic mini-implants for normal and short maxillary body lengths.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Dirk Bister; Christopher J Lux; Bouthayna Al-Tamimi; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.

Authors:  Fulya Ozdemir; Murat Tozlu; Derya Germec-Cakan
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Jun-Ha Ryu; Jae Hyun Park; Trang Vu Thi Thu; Mohamed Bayome; YoonJi Kim; Yoon-Ah Kook
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Is a two-month healing period long enough to achieve osseointegration? A prospective clinical cohort study.

Authors:  M Cassetta; G Brandetti; F Altieri
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  The impact of tooth-borne vs computer-guided bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion on pain and oral health-related quality of life: A parallel cohort study.

Authors:  Federica Altieri; Michele Cassetta
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement in adults.

Authors:  Sebastian Baumgaertel
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Bone thickness of the anterior palate for orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Maike Holm; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; James Mah; Axel Bumann
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Rhino-sinusitis related to endosseous implants extending into the nasal cavity. A case report.

Authors:  G M Raghoebar; R van Weissenbruch; A Vissink
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults.

Authors:  Sungmin Kang; Shin-Jae Lee; Sug-Joon Ahn; Min-Suk Heo; Tae-Woo Kim
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness in patients with normal and open vertical skeletal configurations using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Piyoros Suteerapongpun; Tanapan Wattanachai; Apirum Janhom; Polbhat Tripuwabhrut; Dhirawat Jotikasthira
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.