| Literature DB >> 20618977 |
Yuyan You1, Keping Sun, Lijie Xu, Lei Wang, Tinglei Jiang, Sen Liu, Guanjun Lu, Sean W Berquist, Jiang Feng.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Global climatic oscillations, glaciation cycles and the unique geographic topology of China have profoundly influenced species population distributions. In most species, contemporary distributions of populations cannot be fully understood, except in a historical context. Complex patterns of Pleistocene glaciations, as well as other physiographic changes have influenced the distribution of bat species in China. Until this study, there had been no phylogeographical research on Myotis davidii, an endemic Chinese bat. We used a combination of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers to investigate genetic diversity, population structure, and the demographic history of M. davidii. In particular, we compared patterns of genetic variation to glacial oscillations, topography, and environmental variation during the Pleistocene in an effort to explain current distributions in light of these historical processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20618977 PMCID: PMC3055248 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Topographical map of China showing 17 sampling locations. Samples sizes are shown on the map along with topographic boundaries and elevations.
Genetic variability within the studied Myotis davidii populations based on mtDNA and nDNA data.
| Clade | Province | Location | Coordinates | mtDNA | Microsatellite | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEP | 0.994 | 0.041 | Anhui | AH1 | 1-6 | 7 | N31° 33' E118° 05' | 6 | 0.950 ± 0.100 | 0.030 ± 0.019 | 0.50 ± 0.12 | 0.68 ± 0.13 | 1.43 | 0.25 | |
| Anhui | AH2 | 7-12 | 7 | N29° 47' E118° 10' | 6 | 0.952 ± 0.096 | 0.022 ± 0.014 | 0.49 ± 0.22 | 0.63 ± 0.23 | 1.63 | 0.24 | ||||
| Jiangsu | JS | 3,13-14 | 10 | N31° 22' E119° 48' | 3 | 0.949 ± 0.044 | 0.050 ± 0.027 | 0.59 ± 0.25 | 0.60 ± 0.23 | 1.52 | 0.05 | ||||
| Zhejiang | ZJ | 14-26 | 17 | N30° 06' E120° 02' | 13 | 0.600 ± 0.131 | 0.028 ± 0.016 | 0.54 ± 0.37 | 0.69 ± 0.17 | 1.43 | 0.04 | ||||
| Jiangxi | JX | 27-34 | 11 | N26° 36' E114° 12' | 8 | 0.956 ± 0.054 | 0.027 ± 0.015 | 0.52 ± 0.11 | 0.71 ± 0.17 | 1.44 | 0.13 | ||||
| Chongqing | CQ2 | 35 | 2 | N30° 58' E108° 08' | 1 | - | - | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 1.50 | 0.11 | ||||
| SWP | 0.972 | 0.023 | Chongqing | CQ1 | 36 | 7 | N29° 16' E107° 50' | 1 | - | - | 0.43 ± 0.26 | 0.58 ± 0.18 | 1.51 | 0.17 | |
| Hunan | HN | 37-41 | 6 | N28° 17' E109° 39' | 5 | 0.810 ± 0.172 | 0.015 ± 0.009 | 0.58 ± 0.22 | 0.71 ± 0.29 | 1.62 | 0.19 | ||||
| Guizhou | GZ1 | 42-45 | 6 | N27° 59' E107° 11' | 4 | 0.600 ± 0.175 | 0.007 ± 0.005 | 0.70 ± 0.42 | 0.74 ± 0.10 | 1.47 | 0.05 | ||||
| Guizhou | GZ2 | 46-47 | 7 | N28° 23' E106° 25' | 2 | 0.997 ± 0.127 | 0.032 ± 0.020 | 0. 63 ± 0.22 | 0.73 ± 0.24 | 1.73 | 0.18 | ||||
| Yunnan | YN1 | 1,13 | 6 | N22° 36' E100° 43' | 2 | 0.500 ± 0.250 | 0.004 ± 0.003 | 0.69 ± 0.34 | 0.75 ± 0.13 | 1.75 | 0.02 | ||||
| Yunnan | YN2 | 1 | 7 | N22° 46' E100° 05' | 1 | - | - | 0.57 ± 0.29 | 0.72 ± 0.20 | 1.63 | 0.22 | ||||
| Yunnan | YN3 | 1 | 6 | N25° 03' E102° 42' | 1 | - | - | 0.55 ± 0.26 | 0.71 ± 0.12 | 1.54 | 0.25 | ||||
| Yunnan | YN4 | 13 | 6 | N26° 28' E100° 50' | 1 | - | - | 0.61 ± 0.32 | 0.70 ± 0.19 | 1.60 | 0.22 | ||||
| SH | 0.951 | 0.022 | Guangxi | GX | 48-49 | 7 | N25° 24' E110° 41' | 2 | 0.730 ± 0.220 | 0.007 ± 0.004 | 0.61 ± 0.36 | 0.69 ± 0.29 | 1.60 | 0.13 | |
| Guangdong | GD1 | 50-51 | 6 | N24° 46' E113° 34' | 2 | 0.930 ± 0.165 | 0.012 ± 0.008 | 0.57 ± 0.19 | 0.59 ± 0.26 | 1.53 | 0.24 | ||||
| Guangdong | GD2 | 50,52-53 | 8 | N24° 44' E113° 31' | 3 | 0.453 ± 0.245 | 0.025 ± 0.019 | 0.44 ± 0.21 | 0.52 ± 0.27 | 1.49 | 0.23 | ||||
MEP represents Middle East Plain; SWP represents Southwest Plateau; and SH represents South Hills. The number of individuals per population (n), number of haplotypes (A), haplotype diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π), observed heterozygosities (HO), expected heterozygosities (HE), allelic richness (RS), inbreeding coefficients (Fis).
Characteristics of eight microsatellite loci for Myotis davidii.
| Locus | Primer[μM] | MgCl2[μM] | Primer sequence (5'-3') | Fragment size (bp) | HW | Fluorescein tag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A13 | 0.45 | 2 | F: AACGTTCATTCTGCCAAAGG | 409-421 | 0.849 | FAM |
| R: TCATGCTGTTCCACTTCTGG | ||||||
| E24 | 0.25 | 1.5 | F: GCAGGTTCAATCCCTGACC | 220-228 | 0.841 | FAM |
| R: AAAGCCAGACTCCAAATTCTG | ||||||
| H29 | 0.35 | 1.5 | F: TCAGGTGAGGATTGAAAACAC | 164-188 | 0.95 | FAM |
| R: GCTTTATTTAGCATTGGAGAGC | ||||||
| G9 | 0.25 | 1.5 | F: AGGGGACATACAAGAATCAACC | 162-178 | 0.9912 | FAM |
| R: TAATTTCTCCACTGAACTCCCC | ||||||
| D9 | 0.25 | 2 | F: TCTTTCCTCCCCTGTGCTC | 104-136 | 0.812 | HEX |
| R: TCTGGACCCAAAATGCAGG | ||||||
| G25 | 0.25 | 1.5 | F: TCCTTCCCATTTCTGTGAGG | 131-137 | 0.861 | HEX |
| R: CCATTTCATCCATCCAGTCC | ||||||
| G30 | 0.25 | 1.5 | F: TTGCCAAATTCTGGTATCTTCC | 130-156 | 0.6029 | HEX |
| R: AGAGCTTAATGGGGAGGCTG | ||||||
| C113 | 0.25 | 1.5 | F: ACCTCCCTGCCCTGCAC | 98-102 | 0.74 | HEX |
| R: GCAATGCTTCCTCCAAGTCC |
Figure 2Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of . Maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) of our dataset resulted in concordant topologies (bootstrap values are above the line and divergence times (ka BP), estimated from MDIV, are below the line). Only Bootstrap values above 50% are shown.
Demographic history analysis of Myotis davidii
| Neutrality tests | Mismatch distribution analysis | Tau | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tajima's | Fu's | SSD | ||||||||
| MEP | -2.103 | 0.005 | -8.855 | 0.026 | 0.010 | 0.329 | 0.010 | 0.277 | 10.77 | 79.17 (31.354-175.167) |
| SWP | -0.591 | 0.048 | -21.980 | 0.049 | 0.025 | 0.156 | 0.058 | 0.075 | 9.40 | 69.12 (35.082-96.179) |
| SH | -1.410 | 0.084 | -11.077 | 0.203 | 0.456 | 0.038 | 0.140 | 0.232 | - | - |
| Total | -1.361 | 0.131 | -3.856 | 0.206 | 0.030 | 0.262 | 0.069 | 0.192 | - | - |
Figure 3Graphic derived from the program STRUCTURE. We repeated the Bayesian clustering analysis with STRUCTURE and assigned individuals into clusters at values of K beyond the number considered to maximize the posterior probability and reconstruct the hierarchical relationship among populations. Each individual is represented by a vertical line which is partitioned into K colored segments, the length of each color being proportional to the estimated membership coefficient. Black lines separate individuals of different populations as indicated by the labels at the bottom of the figure. Graphical represented clusters for samples in the Middle East Plain, Southwest Plateau and South Hills. Each individual is depicted by a horizontal line, which is partitioned into K colored sections. Labels above the figure indicate the three lineages (MEP, SWP and SH) based on ML tree.