| Literature DB >> 24188176 |
Guanjun Lu, Aiqing Lin, Jinhong Luo, Dimitri V Blondel, Kelly A Meiklejohn, Keping Sun1, Jiang Feng.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: China is characterized by complex topographic structure and dramatic palaeoclimatic changes, making species biogeography studies particularly interesting. Previous researchers have also demonstrated multiple species experienced complex population histories, meanwhile multiple shelters existed in Chinese mainland. Despite this, species phylogeography is still largely unexplored. In the present study, we used a combination of microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to investigate the phylogeography of the east Asian fish-eating bat (Myotis pilosus).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24188176 PMCID: PMC4228257 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Map of China showing 16 sampling populations. The color pie charts refer to 3 halpotype lineages in Bayesian phylogenetic tree. The abbreviations of sampling populations are consistent with those in Table 1.
Genetic variability of based on mtDNA and microsatellite data
| Jinan, Shandong (SD1) | 17 | 3 | 0.588 ± 0.093 | 0.008 ± 0.004 | 0.76 ± 0.14 | 0.76 ± 0.16 | 4.16 |
| Linyi, Shandong (SD2) | 16 | 4 | 0.542 ± 0.103 | 0.008 ± 0.003 | 0.73 ± 0.21 | 0.61 ± 0.11 | 3.99 |
| Fangshan, Beijing (BJ) | 5 | 1 | - | - | 0.68 ± 0.19 | 0.60 ± 0.32 | 3.81 |
| - | - | - | |||||
| Ji’an, Jiangxi (JX1) | 6 | 3 | 0.500 ± 0.215 | 0.006 ± 0.004 | 0.76 ± 0.13 | 0.58 ± 0.38 | 4.31 |
| Yongzhou,Hunan (HuN) | 14 | 3 | 0.714 ± 0.052 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.77 ± 0.13 | 0.77 ± 0.32 | 4.23 |
| Shaoguan, Guangdong (GD) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | |||||
| Xuanhan, Sichuan (SC2) | 10 | 2 | 0.200 ± 0.154 | 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.71 ± 0.24 | 0.66 ± 0.29 | 4.07 |
| Baoshan, Yunnan (YN1) | 8 | 1 | - | - | 0.82 ± 0.09 | 0.89 ± 0.08 | 4.57 |
| Kunming, Yunnan (YN2) | 8 | 1 | - | - | 0.79 ± 0.08 | 0.70 ± 0.26 | 4.32 |
| Anlong, Guizhou (GZ) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | |||||
| Beichuan, Sichuan (SC1) | 14 | 2 | 0.538 ± 0.052 | 0.001 ± 0.0001 | 0.68 ± 0.35 | 0.57 ± 0.35 | 4.12 |
| - | - | - | |||||
| Xinyang, Henan (HeN) | 5 | 2 | 0.400 ± 0.237 | 0.004 ± 0.008 | 0.76 ± 0.29 | 0.65 ± 0.40 | 4.89 |
| Liushun, Anhui (AH) | 20 | 3 | 0.589 ± 0.043 | 0.011 ± 0.007 | 0.73 ± 0.22 | 0.75 ± 0.30 | 4.33 |
| Jinhua, Zhejiang (ZJ) | 7 | 1 | - | - | 0.73 ± 0.23 | 0.68 ± 0.24 | 4.66 |
| Guangfeng, Jiangxi (JX2) | 9 | 1 | - | - | 0.74 ± 0.20 | 0.61 ± 0.13 | 4.34 |
| Wuyuan, Jiangxi (JX3) | 5 | 2 | 0.600 ± 0.175 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0.84 ± 0.11 | 0.84 ± 0.22 | 4.72 |
| - | - | - | |||||
| - | - | - | |||||
The number of individuals sampled (N), number of haplotypes observed (H), mean and standard deviation of haplotype diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π), expected heterozygosities (He), observed heterozygosities (Ho) and allelic richness (Rs) for the studied Myotis pilosus.
Figure 2Bayesian (BI) phylogenetic tree and TCS networks for based on mtDNA. Neighbour-joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian (BI) methods resulted in concordant topologies with three major lineages (Clade A, B and C). Bootstrap values (BI/ML/NJ, above the line) above 50% and time of the most recent common ancestor (million years ago, below the line) were shown on major lineage nodes. The black dots represented missing steps between observed haplotypes. The short vertical bars referred to substitutions between haplotypes. Circle sizes were proportional to haplotype frequency (denoted in left upper corner). The haplotype numbers in networks were consistent with those in BI phylogenetic tree.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on mtDNA and microsatellite of with three geographical regions: Yangtze plain (YTP) region, Sichuan basin (SCB) region and North and South of China (NSC) region
| | | | | |
| Among regions | 2 | 472.62 | 69.56 | ΦCT = 0.70*** |
| Among populations within regions | 11 | 179.36 | 19.89 | ΦSC = 0.65*** |
| Within populations | 130 | 102.16 | 10.57 | ΦST = 0.83*** |
| | | | | |
| Among regions | 2 | 8.22 | 0.11 | ΦCT = 0.01** |
| Among populations within regions | 9 | 44.92 | 4.60 | ΦSC = 0.05*** |
| Within populations | 278 | 498.84 | 95.41 | ΦST = 0.05*** |
Statistically significant results were indicated by asterisks: **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Bayesian clustering results ( = 2–7) performed in STRUCTURE for . The abbreviations of sampling localities were consistent with those in Table 1.
Figure 4Plot of genetic distance based on mtDNA (A) and microsatellite data (B) versus geographical distance for pairwise population comparisons.
Results of mismatch distribution analyses and neutrality tests for sampled in YunGui plateau (YGP, including population YN1, YN2, GZ, and SC2) region, Southeast China hills (SCH, including JX1, HuN and GD) region, and North China plain (NCP, including BJ, SD1and SD2) region, clade A (A), Clade B (B), Clade C (C)
| 0.32 | 3.87 | 0.72 | 0.66* | 0.34 | Multimodal | 0 | - | |
| 1.5 | 1.31 | 0.32* | 0.03 | 0.28 | Unimodal | 0.80 (0.30–3.45) | 4,520 (1,270–19,500) | |
| −0.18 | 0.53 | 0.10* | 0.01 | 0.01 | Unimodal | 7.20 (2.15–11.15) | 38,700 (12,100–63,100) | |
| −0.7 | 0.61 | 0.12* | 0.04 | 0.18 | Unimodal | 0.80 (0.50–1.70) | 4,520 (2,610–9,100) | |
| 1.22 | 3.42 | 0.65 | 0.09* | 0.17 | Multimodal | 0.77 (0.45–1.26) | - | |
| 1.25 | 2.06 | 0.13* | 0.01 | 0.04 | Unimodal | 3.00 (1.56–5.69) | 15,900 (8,840–32,100) | |
Statistically significant results were indicated by asterisks: * P < 0.05.