Literature DB >> 20616133

Visual performance with real-life tasks under adaptive-optics ocular aberration correction.

Lucie Sawides1, Enrique Gambra, Daniel Pascual, Carlos Dorronsoro, Susana Marcos.   

Abstract

We measured the effect of the correction of the natural aberrations of the eye by means of adaptive optics on the subject's performance on three different visual tasks: subjective sharpness assessment of natural images, familiar face recognition, and facial expression recognition. Images were presented through a dedicated psychophysical channel and viewed through an electromagnetic deformable mirror. Experiments were performed on 17 normal subjects. Ocular aberrations (astigmatism and higher order aberrations) were reduced on average from 0.366 +/- 0.154 to 0.101 +/- 0.055 mum for a 5-mm pupil diameter. On average, subjects considered to be sharper 84 +/- 14% of the images viewed under AO correction, and there was a significant correlation between the amount of corrected aberrations and the percentage of images that the subject considered sharper when observed under AO-corrected aberrations. In all eyes (except one), AO correction improved familiar face recognition, by a factor of x1.13 +/- 0.12 on average. However, AO correction did not improve systematically facial expression recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20616133     DOI: 10.1167/10.5.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  20 in total

1.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Adaptive optics for studying visual function: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Imaging single cells in the living retina.

Authors:  David R Williams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Austin Roorda; Jacque L Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.422

Review 6.  Vision science and adaptive optics, the state of the field.

Authors:  Susana Marcos; John S Werner; Stephen A Burns; William H Merigan; Pablo Artal; David A Atchison; Karen M Hampson; Richard Legras; Linda Lundstrom; Geungyoung Yoon; Joseph Carroll; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Adam M Dubis; Alfredo Dubra; Ann Elsner; Ravi Jonnal; Donald T Miller; Michel Paques; Hannah E Smithson; Laura K Young; Yuhua Zhang; Melanie Campbell; Jennifer Hunter; Andrew Metha; Grazyna Palczewska; Jesse Schallek; Lawrence C Sincich
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Single neural code for blur in subjects with different interocular optical blur orientation.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Lucie Sawides; Carlos Dorronsoro; Eli Peli; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Perceptual adaptation to the correction of natural astigmatism.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Vision is adapted to the natural level of blur present in the retinal image.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael A Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Binocular visual performance and summation after correcting higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Len Zheleznyak; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.