PURPOSE: In radiation therapy there is a need to accurately know the location of the target in real time. A novel radioactive tracking technology has been developed to answer this need. The technology consists of a radioactive implanted fiducial marker designed to minimize migration and a linac mounted tracking device. This study measured the static and dynamic accuracy of the new tracking technology in a clinical radiation therapy environment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The tracking device was installed on the linac gantry. The radioactive marker was located in a tissue equivalent phantom. Marker location was measured simultaneously by the radioactive tracking system and by a Microscribe G2 coordinate measuring machine (certified spatial accuracy of 0.38 mm). Localization consistency throughout a volume and absolute accuracy in the Fixed coordinate system were measured at multiple gantry angles over volumes of at least 10 cm in diameter centered at isocenter. Dynamic accuracy was measured with the marker located inside a breathing phantom. RESULTS: The mean consistency for the static source was 0.58 mm throughout the tested region at all measured gantry angles. The mean absolute position error in the Fixed coordinate system for all gantry angles was 0.97 mm. The mean real-time tracking error for the dynamic source within the breathing phantom was less than 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This novel radioactive tracking technology has the potential to be useful in accurate target localization and real-time monitoring for radiation therapy.
PURPOSE: In radiation therapy there is a need to accurately know the location of the target in real time. A novel radioactive tracking technology has been developed to answer this need. The technology consists of a radioactive implanted fiducial marker designed to minimize migration and a linac mounted tracking device. This study measured the static and dynamic accuracy of the new tracking technology in a clinical radiation therapy environment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The tracking device was installed on the linac gantry. The radioactive marker was located in a tissue equivalent phantom. Marker location was measured simultaneously by the radioactive tracking system and by a Microscribe G2 coordinate measuring machine (certified spatial accuracy of 0.38 mm). Localization consistency throughout a volume and absolute accuracy in the Fixed coordinate system were measured at multiple gantry angles over volumes of at least 10 cm in diameter centered at isocenter. Dynamic accuracy was measured with the marker located inside a breathing phantom. RESULTS: The mean consistency for the static source was 0.58 mm throughout the tested region at all measured gantry angles. The mean absolute position error in the Fixed coordinate system for all gantry angles was 0.97 mm. The mean real-time tracking error for the dynamic source within the breathing phantom was less than 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This novel radioactive tracking technology has the potential to be useful in accurate target localization and real-time monitoring for radiation therapy.
Authors: Jin Aun Ng; Jeremy T Booth; Per R Poulsen; Walther Fledelius; Esben Schjødt Worm; Thomas Eade; Fiona Hegi; Andrew Kneebone; Zdenka Kuncic; Paul J Keall Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kimberley Legge; Doan Nguyen; Jin Aun Ng; Lee Wilton; Matthew Richardson; Jeremy Booth; Paul Keall; Darryl J O'Connor; Peter Greer; Jarad Martin Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Kimberley Legge; Peter B Greer; Paul J Keall; Jeremy T Booth; Sankar Arumugam; Trevor Moodie; Doan T Nguyen; Jarad Martin; Daryl John O'Connor; Joerg Lehmann Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 2.102