Literature DB >> 20615492

Macular hole surgery and cataract extraction: combined vs consecutive surgery.

Aurore Muselier1, Brice Dugas, Xavier Burelle, Marie Passemard, Isabelle Hubert, Bénigne Mathieu, Jean Paul Berrod, Alain M Bron, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the functional and the anatomic outcomes of a combined surgery and consecutive surgery for macular hole and cataract extraction.
DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, comparative case series. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty patients (120 eyes) with an idiopathic macular hole and cataract were operated on in 1 or 2 sessions in 2 academic centers, Dijon University Hospital and Nancy University Hospital. Combined surgery (n = 64) and consecutive surgery (n = 56) were performed between 2006 and 2007. All patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade. Cataract extraction was performed with phacoemulsification followed by a posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. The main outcome measures were near and far visual acuity at 6 and 12 months, and the rate of closure of macular hole evaluated with optical coherence tomography.
RESULTS: After a 12-month follow-up, the postoperative best-corrected visual acuities significantly improved in both the combined and the consecutive surgery groups (near and far vision in both groups, P < .0001). However the improvement of far visual acuity was not significant in the consecutive surgery group at 6 months (P = .06) while such an improvement was observed in the combined surgery group (P < .0001). The rates of closure, 100% and 96% in the combined and the consecutive groups respectively, and the complications did not differ significantly between groups.
CONCLUSION: Both combined and consecutive surgeries are safe and effective methods to treat macular hole and cataract with equivalent functional and anatomic results in both procedures. However, combined surgery shortened the delay for visual recovery. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20615492     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  16 in total

1.  The incidence and distribution of iatrogenic retinal tears in 20-gauge and 23-gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  E Gosse; R Newsom; J Lochhead
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  20-gauge and 23-gauge phacovitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes: comparison of complications and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  R Krishnan; C Tossounis; Y Fung Yang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and phacoemulsification (phaco) versus PPV and deferred phaco for phakic patients with full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) and no significant cataract at baseline: 1-year outcomes of a randomized trial combined PPV/phaco vs PPV/deferred phaco for MH.

Authors:  Karlos Ítalo S Viana; Camila T Gordilho; Felipe P P Almeida; Marcelo M Esperandio; David R Lucena; Denny M Garcia; Ingrid U Scott; André M V Messias; Rodrigo Jorge
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents in vitreoretinal surgery: a prospective multicenter study involving 804 patients.

Authors:  Cyril Meillon; Pierre Henry Gabrielle; Alain Bron; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Vision-related quality of life after pars plana vitrectomy with or without combined cataract surgery for idiopathic macular hole patients.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Xida Liang; Meng Gao; Ju Liu; Limei Liu; Wu Liu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Monovision: a refractive consideration in cataract surgery after vitrectomy?

Authors:  Zia I Carrim; Nicholas M Hickley; Fiona Bishop
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Optical coherence tomography-guided facedown positioning for macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Sumit P Shah; Varsha Manjunath; Adam H Rogers; Caroline R Baumal; Elias Reichel; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Rates of Reoperation and Retinal Detachment after Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  Kamyar Vaziri; Stephen G Schwartz; Krishna S Kishor; Jorge A Fortun; Andrew A Moshfeghi; William E Smiddy; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Analysis of Complications for Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole Surgery Performed by Vitreoretinal Fellows and Consultants.

Authors:  Saud Aljohani; Abdulaziz Alshehri; Abdulaziz Al Taisan; Rakan Algorinees; Valmore A Semidey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-07

Review 10.  A review of current management of vitreomacular traction and macular hole.

Authors:  Alfredo García-Layana; José García-Arumí; José M Ruiz-Moreno; Lluís Arias-Barquet; Francisco Cabrera-López; Marta S Figueroa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.