Literature DB >> 26505804

Rates of Reoperation and Retinal Detachment after Macular Hole Surgery.

Kamyar Vaziri1, Stephen G Schwartz2, Krishna S Kishor1, Jorge A Fortun1, Andrew A Moshfeghi3, William E Smiddy1, Harry W Flynn1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate rates of reoperation and retinal detachment (RD) after macular hole surgery.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients in the insurance claim-based MarketScan databases from 2007 through 2013 with a record of macular hole surgery.
METHODS: Patients with macular hole surgery were identified. Cases of definite (the same eye was coded both times) and presumed (the eye laterality was not coded) macular hole reoperations within 2, 3, and 12 months were queried. In addition, cases of postoperative RD within 2, 3, and 12 months were captured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of macular hole reoperation and postoperative RD, including subgroup analysis based on presence or absence of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.
RESULTS: Records of 23465 macular hole surgeries among 20 764 patients were analyzed. Among presumed reoperations, the rates of reoperation were 4.3% (4.1% after ILM peeling and 5.0% after no ILM peeling; P = 0.01) within 2 months of surgery, 5.5% (5.3% after ILM peeling and 6.2% after no ILM peeling; P = 0.03) within 3 months of surgery, and 9.5% (9.0% after ILM peeling and 11.0% after no ILM peeling; P = 0.01) within 12 months of surgery. The rates for definite reoperations were 1.3% (1.2% after ILM peeling and 1.8% after no ILM peeling; P = 0.04) at 2 months, 1.7% (1.6% after ILM peeling and 2.5% after no ILM peeling; P = 0.004) at 3 months, and 4.1% (3.3% after ILM peeling and 7.5% after no ILM peeling; P < 0.001) at 12 months. The cumulative rate of postoperative RD was 1.81±0.09% to 2.18±0.5% after 2 months, 2.27±0.10% to 3.18±0.67% after 3 months, and 3.92±0.16% to 5.70±1.1% after 12 months. Internal limiting membrane peeling was associated negatively with postoperative RD at 2 months (2.3% vs. 1.7%; P = 0.007), 3 months (2.8% vs. 2.1%; P = 0.004), and 12 months (4.7% vs. 3.3%; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, reoperations for macular hole were performed at low rates. Internal limiting membrane peeling was associated with lower rates of reoperation and RD.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26505804      PMCID: PMC4695225          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of anatomical and visual outcomes of macular hole surgery in patients with high myopia vs. non-high myopia: a case-control study using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tsung-Tien Wu; Ya-Hsin Kung
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Surgery for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing natural history, vitrectomy, and vitrectomy plus autologous serum: Morfields Macular Hole Study Group RAeport no. 1.

Authors:  Eric Ezra; Zdenek J Gregor
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02

3.  Incidence of retinal detachment after macular surgery: a retrospective study of 634 cases.

Authors:  Alexandre Guillaubey; Laure Malvitte; Pierre Olivier Lafontaine; Isabelle Hubert; Alain Bron; Jean Paul Berrod; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Retinal detachment associated with macular hole surgery: characteristics, mechanism, and outcomes.

Authors:  H Tabandeh; N A Chaudhry; W E Smiddy
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Vision-threatening complications of surgery for full-thickness macular holes. Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group.

Authors:  A S Banker; W R Freeman; J W Kim; D Munguia; S P Azen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Noemi Lois; Jennifer Burr; John Norrie; Luke Vale; Jonathan Cook; Alison McDonald; Charles Boachie; Laura Ternent; Gladys McPherson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Idiopathic macular hole surgery in Chinese patients: a randomised study to compare indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling with no internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  A K H Kwok; T Y Y Lai; V W Y Wong
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.227

8.  A comparison of outcomes after indocyanine green and trypan blue assisted internal limiting membrane peeling during macular hole surgery.

Authors:  K L Lee; S Dean; S Guest
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Posterior segment complications after vitrectomy for macular hole.

Authors:  S S Park; D M Marcus; J S Duker; R D Pesavento; T M Topping; A R Frederick; D J D'Amico
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Long-term follow-up after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Christos Haritoglou; Carolin A Gass; Markus Schaumberger; Arnd Gandorfer; Michael W Ulbig; Anselm Kampik
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  11 in total

1.  [Pharmaological vitreolysis with ocriplasmin as a treatment option for symptomatic focal vitreomacular traction with or without macular holes (≤400 μm) compared to tranconjunctival vitrectomy].

Authors:  M Maier; S Abraham; C Frank; C P Lohmann; N Feucht
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chufeng Gu; Qinghua Qiu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ling Ling; Yao Liu; Baixing Zhou; Feifei Gao; Zhe Hu; Man Tian; Yiqiao Xing; Kaibao Ji; Tao Sun; Wentian Zhou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Clinical and histological evaluation of large macular hole surgery using the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique.

Authors:  Satoru Kase; Wataru Saito; Shohei Mori; Michiyuki Saito; Ryo Ando; Zhenyu Dong; Tomohiro Suzuki; Kousuke Noda; Susumu Ishida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-16

5.  The Pigtail Sign: A New Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Finding After Inverted ILM Flap Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole.

Authors:  Samir Mohamed El Baha; Omar Elbaha; Mahmoud A Abouhussein
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-03

6.  The Clinical Course of Patients with Idiopathic Epiretinal Membranes and Good Visual Acuity Managed Without Surgery.

Authors:  Eduardo F Damasceno; Nadyr A Damasceno; Ashley M Crane; Nicolas A Yannuzzi; Nidhi Relhan; William E Smiddy; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-12

7.  Incidence and management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after pars plana vitrectomy and sutureless scleral-fixated intraocular lens.

Authors:  Karthik Kumar; Piyush Kohli; Naresh Babu; Gauri Khare; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Surgical Management of Recurrent and Persistent Macular Holes: A Practical Approach.

Authors:  Jessica L Cao; Peter K Kaiser
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-09-07

9.  Visual Recovery after Macular Hole Surgery and Related Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  Soo Han Kim; Hong Kyu Kim; Jong Yun Yang; Sung Chul Lee; Sung Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-13

10.  A surgical simulator for peeling the inner limiting membrane during wet conditions.

Authors:  Seiji Omata; Yusei Someya; Shyn'ya Adachi; Taisuke Masuda; Takeshi Hayakawa; Kanako Harada; Mamoru Mitsuishi; Kiyohito Totsuka; Fumiyuki Araki; Muneyuki Takao; Makoto Aihara; Fumihito Arai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.