Literature DB >> 23154500

20-gauge and 23-gauge phacovitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes: comparison of complications and long-term outcomes.

R Krishnan1, C Tossounis, Y Fung Yang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the complications and long-term visual and anatomical outcomes of 20- and 23-gauge phacovitrectomy (PVT) for idiopathic macular hole repair.
METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series of 72 eyes with idiopathic macular holes were managed with 20-gauge PVT (n=36) or 23-gauge PVT (n=36). All patients underwent a posterior-chamber intra-ocular lens implantation and internal-limiting-membrane peel with the aid of either trypan blue or brilliant blue G(250) dyes.
RESULTS: The macular hole closure rate was 97% with 20-gauge PVT and 100% with 23-gauge PVT. Mean follow-up was 24.06 (±12.83) months with 20-gauge PVT and 17.47 (±5.79) with 23-gauge PVT. Mean visual acuity improvement in LogMar was 0.41 (±0.32) with 20-gauge PVT and 0.52 (±0.25) with 23-gauge PVT (P=0.135). The incidence of retinal breaks was higher with the 20-gauge PVT compared with the 23-gauge PVT, occurring in 13 (36.1%) and 4 (11.1%) cases, respectively (P=0.025). There were no cases of retinal detachment. Postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), at day 1, was significantly higher with 20-gauge PVT at 24.77 (±12.68) mm Hg compared with 17.20 (±6.95) mm Hg in 23-gauge PVT (P=0.0028). Operating times were longer in 20-gauge PVT at 89.36 (±15.26) min compared with the 23-gauge PVT at 79.33 (±23.82) min (P=0.04).
CONCLUSION: The 20-gauge PVT compared with 23-gauge PVT for macular hole repair is a slightly longer procedure and was associated with an increased incidence of retinal breaks and short-term elevated IOP. Both techniques have comparable visual and anatomical outcomes, but the 23-gauge PVT has advantages with regard to safety profile and operating time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23154500      PMCID: PMC3545392          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  26 in total

1.  Surgery for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing natural history, vitrectomy, and vitrectomy plus autologous serum: Morfields Macular Hole Study Group RAeport no. 1.

Authors:  Eric Ezra; Zdenek J Gregor
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02

2.  Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  Claus Eckardt
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2005 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy for macular hole treatment.

Authors:  Ioannis P Theocharis; Anastassia Alexandridou; Nasser Jadidi Gili; Zoran Tomic
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2005-04

Review 4.  Comparison of 25, 23 and 20-gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  Marc J Spirn
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  Vision-threatening complications of surgery for full-thickness macular holes. Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group.

Authors:  A S Banker; W R Freeman; J W Kim; D Munguia; S P Azen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Macular hole surgery with internal-limiting membrane peeling and intravitreous air.

Authors:  D W Park; J O Sipperley; S R Sneed; P U Dugel; J Jacobsen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Postoperative retinal break after 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy: report of four cases.

Authors:  Tetsuhiko Okuda; Akira Nishimura; Akira Kobayashi; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Long-term anatomic and visual acuity outcomes after initial anatomic success with macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Alexei L Moraczewski; William E Smiddy; Harry W Flynn; William J Feuer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Vitreous surgery for macular holes.

Authors:  R T Wendel; A C Patel; N E Kelly; T C Salzano; J W Wells; G D Novack
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Combined phacovitrectomy for macular hole: long-term results.

Authors:  Simon Rogers; Krishnappa C Madhusudhana; H Kwon Kang; Andrew J Luff; Chris R Canning; Richard S B Newsom
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec
View more
  20 in total

1.  Iatrogenic retinal breaks and postoperative retinal detachments in microincision vitrectomy surgery compared with conventional 20-gauge vitrectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G H Chen; R Tzekov; F Z Jiang; S H Mao; Y H Tong; W S Li
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Microincision cataract surgery combined with vitrectomy: a case series.

Authors:  A Jalil; L Steeples; S Subramani; M S Bindra; F Dhawahir-Scala; N Patton
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Clinical outcomes of 25-gauge vitrectomy surgery for vitreoretinal diseases: comparison of vitrectomy alone and phaco-vitrectomy.

Authors:  Mucella Arikan Yorgun; Yasin Toklu; Melek Mutlu; Umut Ozen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Risk factors for posterior synechiae of the iris after 23-gauge phacovitrectomy.

Authors:  Jong-Hyun Oh; Jaehoon Na; Seong-Woo Kim; Jaeryung Oh; Kuhl Huh
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Surgical and Functional Results of Hybrid 25-27-Gauge Vitrectomy Combined with Coaxial 2.2 mm Small Incision Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Fabian Höhn; Florian Kretz; Mitrofanis Pavlidis
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Comparison of outcomes between 20, 23 and 25 gauge vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole.

Authors:  Fatma Dihowm; Mathew MacCumber
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2015-06-26

7.  Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon.

Authors:  Teresa M Jenisch; Florian Zeman; Michael Koller; David A Märker; Horst Helbig; Wolfgang A Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-13

Review 8.  Idiopathic vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  D H W Steel; A J Lotery
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  Optimal management of idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Haifa A Madi; Ibrahim Masri; David H Steel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-13

10.  Photoreceptor Outer Segment on Internal Limiting Membrane after Macular Hole Surgery: Implications for Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Michael E Grinton; Maria T Sandinha; David H W Steel
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.