Literature DB >> 20614214

Two systems of spatial representation underlying navigation.

Sang Ah Lee1, Elizabeth S Spelke.   

Abstract

We review evidence for two distinct cognitive processes by which humans and animals represent the navigable environment. One process uses the shape of the extended 3D surface layout to specify the navigator's position and orientation. A second process uses objects and patterns as beacons to specify the locations of significant objects. Although much of the evidence for these processes comes from neurophysiological studies of navigating animals and neuroimaging studies of human adults, behavioral studies of navigating children shed light both on the nature of these systems and on their interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20614214      PMCID: PMC3129622          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2349-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  70 in total

1.  Neuropsychological evidence for a topographical learning mechanism in parahippocampal cortex.

Authors:  R Epstein; E A Deyoe; D Z Press; A C Rosen; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Asymmetrical participation of the left and right hippocampus for representing environmental geometry in homing pigeons.

Authors:  Daniele Nardi; Verner P Bingman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-17       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Ants learn geometry and features.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Guy Beugnon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Children's use of geometry for reorientation.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-09

5.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children applies only to symmetric spaces.

Authors:  Adina R Lew; Bryony Gibbons; Caroline Murphy; J Gavin Bremner
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-05

7.  How do young children determine location? Evidence from disorientation tasks.

Authors:  Stella F Lourenco; Janellen Huttenlocher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-09-26

8.  Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: a comparison with rats.

Authors:  R F Wang; L Hermer; E S Spelke
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation.

Authors:  L Hermer; E Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-12

Review 10.  Spatial representation across species: geometry, language, and maps.

Authors:  Barbara Landau; Laura Lakusta
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  25 in total

1.  Environmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Alex T Keinath; Joshua B Julian; Russell A Epstein; Isabel A Muzzio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Janellen Huttenlocher; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

3.  Overtraining and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Katherine A Gaskin; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-01-03

4.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Spatial Boundaries in the Human Subiculum.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Jonathan F Miller; Andrew J Watrous; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Gregory A Worrell; Brent M Berry; Joshua P Aronson; Kathryn A Davis; Robert E Gross; Bradley Lega; Sameer Sheth; Sandhitsu R Das; Joel M Stein; Richard Gorniak; Daniel S Rizzuto; Joshua Jacobs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Reorientation by features and geometry: Effects of healthy and degenerative age-related cognitive decline.

Authors:  Kevin Leonard; Viktoriya Vasylkiv; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Chicks, like children, spontaneously reorient by three-dimensional environmental geometry, not by image matching.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Elizabeth S Spelke; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: young children's use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Valeria A Sovrano; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-01-16

8.  For humans navigating without vision, navigation depends upon the layout of mechanically contacted ground surfaces.

Authors:  Steven J Harrison; Scott Bonnette; MaryLauren Malone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Coding of Navigational Distance and Functional Constraint of Boundaries in the Human Scene-Selective Cortex.

Authors:  Jeongho Park; Soojin Park
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Using eye-tracking to understand relations between visual attention and language in children's spatial skills.

Authors:  Hilary E Miller; Heather L Kirkorian; Vanessa R Simmering
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.