Literature DB >> 28089516

Environmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation.

Alex T Keinath1, Joshua B Julian1, Russell A Epstein1, Isabel A Muzzio2.   

Abstract

When a navigator's internal sense of direction is disrupted, she must rely on external cues to regain her bearings, a process termed spatial reorientation. Extensive research has demonstrated that the geometric shape of the environment exerts powerful control over reorientation behavior, but the neural and cognitive mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not well understood. Whereas some theories claim that geometry controls behavior through an allocentric mechanism potentially tied to the hippocampus, others postulate that disoriented navigators reach their goals by using an egocentric view-matching strategy. To resolve this debate, we characterized hippocampal representations during reorientation. We first recorded from CA1 cells as disoriented mice foraged in chambers of various shapes. We found that the alignment of the recovered hippocampal map was determined by the geometry of the chamber, but not by nongeometric cues, even when these cues could be used to disambiguate geometric ambiguities. We then recorded hippocampal activity as disoriented mice performed a classical goal-directed spatial memory task in a rectangular chamber. Again, we found that the recovered hippocampal map aligned solely to the chamber geometry. Critically, we also found a strong correspondence between the hippocampal map alignment and the animal's behavior, making it possible to predict the search location of the animal from neural responses on a trial-by-trial basis. Together, these results demonstrate that spatial reorientation involves the alignment of the hippocampal map to local geometry. We hypothesize that geometry may be an especially salient cue for reorientation because it is an inherently stable aspect of the environment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive map; disorientation; geometric module; hippocampus; navigation; place cells; spatial geometry; spatial reorientation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28089516      PMCID: PMC5296211          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  47 in total

1.  Head direction cells in rats with hippocampal or overlying neocortical lesions: evidence for impaired angular path integration.

Authors:  E J Golob; J S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Functional organization of the extrinsic and intrinsic circuitry of the parahippocampal region.

Authors:  M P Witter; H J Groenewegen; F H Lopes da Silva; A H Lohman
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Activity of striatal neurons reflects dynamic encoding and recoding of procedural memories.

Authors:  Terra D Barnes; Yasuo Kubota; Dan Hu; Dezhe Z Jin; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Optogenetic dissection of entorhinal-hippocampal functional connectivity.

Authors:  Sheng-Jia Zhang; Jing Ye; Chenglin Miao; Albert Tsao; Ignas Cerniauskas; Debora Ledergerber; May-Britt Moser; Edvard I Moser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Place recognition and heading retrieval are mediated by dissociable cognitive systems in mice.

Authors:  Joshua B Julian; Alexander T Keinath; Isabel A Muzzio; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Directional control of hippocampal place fields.

Authors:  K J Jeffery; J G Donnett; N Burgess; J M O'Keefe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Chicks, like children, spontaneously reorient by three-dimensional environmental geometry, not by image matching.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Elizabeth S Spelke; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children.

Authors:  L Hermer; E S Spelke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Hippocampal place cell instability after lesions of the head direction cell network.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Calton; Robert W Stackman; Jeremy P Goodridge; William B Archey; Paul A Dudchenko; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  16 in total

1.  Hippocampal Place Fields Maintain a Coherent and Flexible Map across Long Timescales.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Kinsky; David W Sullivan; William Mau; Michael E Hasselmo; Howard B Eichenbaum
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  The role of the hippocampus in navigation is memory.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Comparative cognition of number and space: the case of geometry and of the mental number line.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Dynamical self-organization and efficient representation of space by grid cells.

Authors:  Ronald W DiTullio; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  GABAergic CA1 neurons are more stable following context changes than glutamatergic cells.

Authors:  Peter J Schuette; Juliane M Ikebara; Fernando M C V Reis; Avishek Adhikari; Sandra Maesta-Pereira; Anita Torossian; Ekayana Sethi; Alexandre H Kihara; Jonathan C Kao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Navigable Space and Traversable Edges Differentially Influence Reorientation in Sighted and Blind Mice.

Authors:  Marc E Normandin; Maria C Garza; Manuel Miguel Ramos-Alvarez; Joshua B Julian; Tuoyo Eresanara; Nishanth Punjaala; Juan H Vasquez; Matthew R Lopez; Isabel A Muzzio
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-05-10

Review 7.  The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Eva Zita Patai; Joshua B Julian; Hugo J Spiers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  The Neurocognitive Basis of Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Joshua B Julian; Alexandra T Keinath; Steven A Marchette; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Environmental deformations dynamically shift human spatial memory.

Authors:  Alexandra T Keinath; Ohad Rechnitz; Vijay Balasubramanian; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Behavior-dependent directional tuning in the human visual-navigation network.

Authors:  Matthias Nau; Tobias Navarro Schröder; Markus Frey; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.