Literature DB >> 2061200

Temporal modulation transfer functions in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): I. Psychophysical modulation detection thresholds.

G M Klump1, K Okanoya.   

Abstract

Temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTF) were obtained from four European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) using a psychophysical Go/NoGo procedure combined with the method of constant stimuli. The TMTF for a continuous, broad-band noise of 55 dB SPL had a low-pass characteristic with a cut-off frequency of 123 Hz. For an 800 ms gated stimulus of the same sound-pressure level, the TMTF had the shape of a band-pass filter with the most sensitive modulation frequency at around 20 Hz. At 75 dB the band-pass shape of the TMTF was preserved, whereas at 35 dB SPL the TMTF had a low-pass characteristic. The cut-off frequency of the TMTF for continuous noise depends on which part of the spectrum carries the information on the envelope fluctuations. If only sound energy below 1 or 1.5 kHz is modulated, then the cut-off frequencies are 40 and 38 Hz, respectively. If only sound above 3 kHz carries the information on the modulation, then the cut-off frequency is 125 Hz and the shape of the TMTF is similar to that found for broadband noise. The results are discussed with respect to the coding of sinusoidal amplitude modulations by the auditory system and to different measures of time, frequency and intensity resolution in the starling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2061200     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(91)90182-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Notched-noise precursors improve detection of low-frequency amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Ali Almishaal; Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Amplitude modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency and stimulus duration: comparisons between macaques and humans.

Authors:  Kevin N O'Connor; Jeffrey S Johnson; Mamiko Niwa; Nigel C Noriega; Elizabeth A Marshall; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Detection thresholds for amplitude modulations of tones in budgerigar, rabbit, and human.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Angela D Ketterer; Kristina S Abrams; Douglas M Schwarz; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Auditory memory for temporal characteristics of sound.

Authors:  Melanie A Zokoll; Georg M Klump; Ulrike Langemann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Functional groups in the avian auditory system.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Thane Fremouw; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural correlates of behavioral amplitude modulation sensitivity in the budgerigar midbrain.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Erikson G Neilans; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Best sensitivity of temporal modulation transfer functions in laboratory mice matches the amplitude modulation embedded in vocalizations.

Authors:  Huaizhen Cai; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Neurometric amplitude-modulation detection threshold in the guinea-pig ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Christian Füllgrabe; Ian M Winter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Descending pathways generate perception of and neural responses to weak sensory input.

Authors:  Michael G Metzen; Chengjie G Huang; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Biomechanics of the peafowl's crest reveals frequencies tuned to social displays.

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Daniel Van Beveren; Roslyn Dakin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.