Literature DB >> 20608873

Structure of social networks in a passerine bird: consequences for sexual selection and the evolution of mating strategies.

Kevin P Oh1, Alexander V Badyaev.   

Abstract

The social environment is a critical determinant of fitness and, in many taxa, is shaped by an individual's behavioral discrimination among social contexts, suggesting that animals can actively influence the selection they experience. In competition to attract females, males may modify sexual selection by choosing social environments in which they are more attractive relative to rivals. Across the population, such behaviors should influence sexual selection patterns by altering the relationship between male mating success and sexual ornament elaboration. Here we use network analysis to examine patterns of male social behavior in relation to plumage ornamentation and mating success in a free-living population of house finches. During the nonbreeding season, less elaborate males changed associations with distinct social groups more frequently, compared to more elaborate males that showed greater fidelity to a single social group. By the onset of pair formation, socially labile males effectively increased their attractiveness relative to other males in the same flocks. Consequently, males that frequently moved between social groups had greater pairing success than less social individuals with equivalent sexual ornamentation. We discuss these results in relation to conditional mating tactics and the role of social behavior in evolutionary change by sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20608873     DOI: 10.1086/655216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  48 in total

Review 1.  The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Carry-over effects of the social environment on future divorce probability in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Antica Culina; Camilla A Hinde; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Juvenile social experience affects pairing success at adulthood: congruence with the loser effect?

Authors:  Mylene M Mariette; Charlène Cathaud; Rémi Chambon; Clémentine Vignal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Agonistic reciprocity is associated with reduced male reproductive success within haremic social networks.

Authors:  Tessa K Solomon-Lane; Devaleena S Pradhan; Madelyne C Willis; Matthew S Grober
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Dynamic network partnerships and social contagion drive cooperation.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; T Brandt Ryder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Topological effects of network structure on long-term social network dynamics in a wild mammal.

Authors:  Amiyaal Ilany; Andrew S Booms; Kay E Holekamp
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Richard James; Jens Krause; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  A Bayesian Approach to Social Structure Uncovers Cryptic Regulation of Group Dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brad R Foley; Julia B Saltz; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Paul Marjoram
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Offspring social network structure predicts fitness in families.

Authors:  Nick J Royle; Thomas W Pike; Philipp Heeb; Heinz Richner; Mathias Kölliker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.