Literature DB >> 20607693

Predicting the accuracy of protein-ligand docking on homology models.

Annalisa Bordogna1, Alessandro Pandini, Laura Bonati.   

Abstract

Ligand-protein docking is increasingly used in Drug Discovery. The initial limitations imposed by a reduced availability of target protein structures have been overcome by the use of theoretical models, especially those derived by homology modeling techniques. While this greatly extended the use of docking simulations, it also introduced the need for general and robust criteria to estimate the reliability of docking results given the model quality. To this end, a large-scale experiment was performed on a diverse set including experimental structures and homology models for a group of representative ligand-protein complexes. A wide spectrum of model quality was sampled using templates at different evolutionary distances and different strategies for target-template alignment and modeling. The obtained models were scored by a selection of the most used model quality indices. The binding geometries were generated using AutoDock, one of the most common docking programs. An important result of this study is that indeed quantitative and robust correlations exist between the accuracy of docking results and the model quality, especially in the binding site. Moreover, state-of-the-art indices for model quality assessment are already an effective tool for an a priori prediction of the accuracy of docking experiments in the context of groups of proteins with conserved structural characteristics.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20607693      PMCID: PMC3057020          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  52 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality.

Authors:  N Siew; A Elofsson; L Rychlewski; D Fischer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  C Notredame; D G Higgins; J Heringa
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-09-08       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Relationship between multiple sequence alignments and quality of protein comparative models.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-01-01

Review 5.  Flexible ligand-flexible protein docking in protein kinase systems.

Authors:  Chung F Wong
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-10-13

Review 6.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Michele Ceriani; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

8.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A study of quality measures for protein threading models.

Authors:  S Cristobal; A Zemla; D Fischer; L Rychlewski; A Elofsson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  28 in total

1.  Do crystal structures obviate the need for theoretical models of GPCRs for structure-based virtual screening?

Authors:  Hao Tang; Xiang Simon Wang; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-03-13

2.  Ligand-Binding-Site Structure Refinement Using Molecular Dynamics with Restraints Derived from Predicted Binding Site Templates.

Authors:  Hugo Guterres; Hui Sun Lee; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Homology models of mouse and rat estrogen receptor-α ligand-binding domain created by in silico mutagenesis of a human template: molecular docking with 17ß-estradiol, diethylstilbestrol, and paraben analogs.

Authors:  Thomas L Gonzalez; James M Rae; Justin A Colacino; Rudy J Richardson
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-28

4.  Genotypic and Mechanistic Characterization of Subtype-Specific HIV Adaptation to Host Cellular Immunity.

Authors:  Natalie N Kinloch; Guinevere Q Lee; Jonathan M Carlson; Steven W Jin; Chanson J Brumme; Helen Byakwaga; Conrad Muzoora; Mwebesa B Bwana; Kyle D Cobarrubias; Peter W Hunt; Jeff N Martin; Mary Carrington; David R Bangsberg; P Richard Harrigan; Mark A Brockman; Zabrina L Brumme
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 6.  Chemical space of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors: New approaches for discovering novel drugs for old bugs.

Authors:  Bharath Srinivasan; Sam Tonddast-Navaei; Ambrish Roy; Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 12.944

7.  New aryl hydrocarbon receptor homology model targeted to improve docking reliability.

Authors:  Ilaria Motto; Annalisa Bordogna; Anatoly A Soshilov; Michael S Denison; Laura Bonati
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Assessment of refinement of template-based models in CASP11.

Authors:  Vivek Modi; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-15

9.  PL-PatchSurfer2: Improved Local Surface Matching-Based Virtual Screening Method That Is Tolerant to Target and Ligand Structure Variation.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Charles W Christoffer; Jibo Wang; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11.

Authors:  Peter J Huwe; Qifang Xu; Maxim V Shapovalov; Vivek Modi; Mark D Andrake; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.