Literature DB >> 21981577

New aryl hydrocarbon receptor homology model targeted to improve docking reliability.

Ilaria Motto1, Annalisa Bordogna, Anatoly A Soshilov, Michael S Denison, Laura Bonati.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent, basic helix-loop-helix Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS) containing transcription factor that can bind and be activated by structurally diverse chemicals, including the toxic environmental contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). As no experimentally determined structures of the AhR ligand binding domain (LBD) are available and previous homology models were only derived from apo template structures, we developed a new model based on holo X-ray structures of the hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α) PAS B domain, targeted to improve the accuracy of the binding site for molecular docking applications. We experimentally confirmed the ability of two HIF-2α crystallographic ligands to bind to the mAhR with relatively high affinity and demonstrated that they are AhR agonists, thus justifying the use of the holo HIF-2α structures as templates. A specific modeling/docking approach was proposed to predict the binding modes of AhR ligands in the modeled LBD. It was validated by comparison of the calculated and the experimental binding affinities of active THS ligands and TCDD for the mAhR and by functional activity analysis using several mAhR mutants generated on the basis of the modeling results. Finally the ability of the proposed approach to reproduce the different affinities of TCDD for AhRs of different species was confirmed, and a first test of its reliability in virtual screening is carried out by analyzing the correlation between the calculated and experimental binding affinities of a set of 14 PCDDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21981577      PMCID: PMC3263330          DOI: 10.1021/ci2001617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  57 in total

1.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Mechanism-based common reactivity pattern (COREPA) modelling of aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding affinity.

Authors:  P I Petkov; J C Rowlands; R Budinsky; B Zhao; M S Denison; O Mekenyan
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Identification of optimum computational protocols for modeling the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and its interaction with ligands.

Authors:  Ashutosh S Jogalekar; Stephan Reiling; Roy J Vaz
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Devleena M Shivakumar; Sarah E Boyce; Matthew P Jacobson; David A Case; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  The Ah receptor: a regulator of the biochemical and toxicological actions of structurally diverse chemicals.

Authors:  M S Denison; S Heath-Pagliuso
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Modeling of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand binding domain and its utility in virtual ligand screening to predict new AhR ligands.

Authors:  William H Bisson; Daniel C Koch; Edmond F O'Donnell; Sammy M Khalil; Nancy I Kerkvliet; Robert L Tanguay; Ruben Abagyan; Siva Kumar Kolluri
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Artificial ligand binding within the HIF2alpha PAS-B domain of the HIF2 transcription factor.

Authors:  Thomas H Scheuermann; Diana R Tomchick; Mischa Machius; Yan Guo; Richard K Bruick; Kevin H Gardner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins: quantitative in vitro and in vivo structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  G Mason; K Farrell; B Keys; J Piskorska-Pliszczynska; L Safe; S Safe
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.221

View more
  33 in total

1.  In silico identification of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist with biological activity in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Ashley J Parks; Michael P Pollastri; Mark E Hahn; Elizabeth A Stanford; Olga Novikov; Diana G Franks; Sarah E Haigh; Supraja Narasimhan; Trent D Ashton; Timothy G Hopper; Dmytro Kozakov; Dimitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda; Jennifer J Schlezinger; David H Sherr
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  Methylindoles and Methoxyindoles are Agonists and Antagonists of Human Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor.

Authors:  Martina Stepankova; Iveta Bartonkova; Eva Jiskrova; Radim Vrzal; Sridhar Mani; Sandhya Kortagere; Zdenek Dvorak
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Bis-aryloxadiazoles as effective activators of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Kaitlin J Basham; Vasudev R Bhonde; Collin Kieffer; James B C Mack; Matthew Hess; Bryan E Welm; Ryan E Looper
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Naturally occurring marine brominated indoles are aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands/agonists.

Authors:  Danica E DeGroot; Diana G Franks; Tatsuo Higa; Junichi Tanaka; Mark E Hahn; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  A Biomimetic, One-Step Transformation of Simple Indolic Compounds to Malassezia-Related Alkaloids with High AhR Potency and Efficacy.

Authors:  Nikitia Mexia; Stamatis Koutrakis; Guochun He; Alexios-Leandros Skaltsounis; Michael S Denison; Prokopios Magiatis
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  AhR sensing of bacterial pigments regulates antibacterial defence.

Authors:  Pedro Moura-Alves; Kellen Faé; Erica Houthuys; Anca Dorhoi; Annika Kreuchwig; Jens Furkert; Nicola Barison; Anne Diehl; Antje Munder; Patricia Constant; Tatsiana Skrahina; Ute Guhlich-Bornhof; Marion Klemm; Anne-Britta Koehler; Silke Bandermann; Christian Goosmann; Hans-Joachim Mollenkopf; Robert Hurwitz; Volker Brinkmann; Simon Fillatreau; Mamadou Daffe; Burkhard Tümmler; Michael Kolbe; Hartmut Oschkinat; Gerd Krause; Stefan H E Kaufmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Molecular modeling of the AhR structure and interactions can shed light on ligand-dependent activation and transformation mechanisms.

Authors:  Laura Bonati; Dario Corrada; Sara Giani Tagliabue; Stefano Motta
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-01

8.  Comparative analysis of homology models of the AH receptor ligand binding domain: verification of structure-function predictions by site-directed mutagenesis of a nonfunctional receptor.

Authors:  Domenico Fraccalvieri; Anatoly A Soshilov; Sibel I Karchner; Diana G Franks; Alessandro Pandini; Laura Bonati; Mark E Hahn; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  An aryl hydrocarbon receptor from the caecilian Gymnopis multiplicata suggests low dioxin affinity in the ancestor of all three amphibian orders.

Authors:  Sarah A Kazzaz; Sara Giani Tagliabue; Diana G Franks; Michael S Denison; Mark E Hahn; Laura Bonati; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.822

10.  Specific ligand binding domain residues confer low dioxin responsiveness to AHR1β of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Camila Odio; Sarah A Holzman; Michael S Denison; Domenico Fraccalvieri; Laura Bonati; Diana G Franks; Mark E Hahn; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.