Literature DB >> 22275072

Do crystal structures obviate the need for theoretical models of GPCRs for structure-based virtual screening?

Hao Tang1, Xiang Simon Wang, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Alexander Tropsha.   

Abstract

Recent highly expected structural characterizations of agonist-bound and antagonist-bound beta-2 adrenoreceptor (β2AR) by X-ray crystallography have been widely regarded as critical advances to enable more effective structure-based discovery of GPCRs ligands. It appears that this very important development may have undermined many previous efforts to develop 3D theoretical models of GPCRs. To address this question directly, we have compared several historical β2AR models versus the inactive state and nanobody-stabilized active state of β2AR crystal structures in terms of their structural similarity and effectiveness of use in virtual screening for β2AR specific agonists and antagonists. Theoretical models, incluing both homology and de novo types, were collected from five different groups who have published extensively in the field of GPCRs modeling. All models were built before X-ray structures became available. In general, β2AR theoretical models differ significantly from the crystal structure in terms of TMH definition and the global packing. Nevertheless, surprisingly, several models afforded hit rates resulting from virtual screening of large chemical library enriched by known β2AR ligands that exceeded those using X-ray structures. The hit rates were particularly higher for agonists. Furthemore, the screening performance of models is associated with local structural quality, such as the RMSDs for binding pocket residues and the ability to capture accurately, most if not all critical protein/ligand interactions. These results suggest that carefully built models of GPCRs could capture critical chemical and structural features of the binding pocket, and thus may be even more useful for practical structure-based drug discovery than X-ray structures.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22275072      PMCID: PMC4133977          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  58 in total

1.  Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  K Palczewski; T Kumasaka; T Hori; C A Behnke; H Motoshima; B A Fox; I Le Trong; D C Teller; T Okada; R E Stenkamp; M Yamamoto; M Miyano
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Three-dimensional models for beta-adrenergic receptor complexes with agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Kristina E Furse; Terry P Lybrand
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes.

Authors:  Susan L McGovern; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Modeling the 3D structure of GPCRs: advances and application to drug discovery.

Authors:  Oren M Becker; Sharon Shacham; Yael Marantz; Silvia Noiman
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2003-05

Review 5.  Drug design strategies for targeting G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Thomas Klabunde; Gerhard Hessler
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 3.164

6.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors suitable targets?

Authors:  Caterina Bissantz; Philippe Bernard; Marcel Hibert; Didier Rognan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-01-01

8.  Status of GPCR modeling and docking as reflected by community-wide GPCR Dock 2010 assessment.

Authors:  Irina Kufareva; Manuel Rueda; Vsevolod Katritch; Raymond C Stevens; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Organization of the G protein-coupled receptors rhodopsin and opsin in native membranes.

Authors:  Yan Liang; Dimitrios Fotiadis; Sławomir Filipek; David A Saperstein; Krzysztof Palczewski; Andreas Engel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Predicted 3D structure for the human beta 2 adrenergic receptor and its binding site for agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Peter L Freddolino; M Yashar S Kalani; Nagarajan Vaidehi; Wely B Floriano; Spencer E Hall; Rene J Trabanino; Victor Wai Tak Kam; William A Goddard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Modelling three-dimensional protein structures for applications in drug design.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; Andreas Bergner; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Molecular determinants of ligand binding at the human histamine H1 receptor: Site-directed mutagenesis results analyzed with ligand docking and molecular dynamics studies at H1 homology and crystal structure models.

Authors:  Tania C Cordova-Sintjago; Lijuan Fang; Martijn Bruysters; Rob Leurs; Raymond G Booth
Journal:  J Chem Pharm Res       Date:  2012-06

3.  Protein structure prediction provides comparable performance to crystallographic structures in docking-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Hongying Du; Jeffrey R Brender; Jian Zhang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening - homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study.

Authors:  Stefan Mordalski; Jagna Witek; Sabina Smusz; Krzysztof Rataj; Andrzej J Bojarski
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  GPCRs from fusarium graminearum detection, modeling and virtual screening - the search for new routes to control head blight disease.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bresso; Roberto Togawa; Kim Hammond-Kosack; Martin Urban; Bernard Maigret; Natalia Florencio Martins
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Development of 7TM receptor-ligand complex models using ligand-biased, semi-empirical helix-bundle repacking in torsion space: application to the agonist interaction of the human dopamine D2 receptor.

Authors:  Marcus Malo; Ronnie Persson; Peder Svensson; Kristina Luthman; Lars Brive
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  A Chemosensory GPCR as a Potential Target to Control the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne incognita Parasitism in Plants.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bresso; Diana Fernandez; Deisy X Amora; Philippe Noel; Anne-Sophie Petitot; Maria-Eugênia Lisei de Sa; Erika V S Albuquerque; Etienne G J Danchin; Bernard Maigret; Natália F Martins
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.